有關簽訂租約時業主毀約

其實業主要求租客提供入息證明係可以,租客提供與否亦係自由,而租客亦係可以要求業主提供屋契,或者係銀行既出租同意書,呢個係租客保障自己既權利,不過現況中唔覺有人會咁做(假設銀行收樓,租客係冇保障).

至於入息證明呢樣野,我個人認為唔係一個絕對關鍵,所以唔可能因為"遲交"而不履約,但講到打官司,永遠都係打過先知,因為打得就一定打細節位,你只係大約講左個情況.

2014-04-08 12:05:34 補充：
1. 可以.係香港打官司係好平常.
2. 如果你正式簽約果陣已經預備好,我認為你比較合理.
3. 唔會,如果經紀講大話,仲可能間接幫左你.
4. 你只要堅信你所講既係事實就可以.
5. 只有金錢及時間上損失.

2014-04-08 12:08:01 補充：
話時話,遲交可以不履約,咁如果簽約遲到,係咪又一樣可以咁做呢?

2014-04-08 12:14:14 補充：
如果去報案話係行騙,首先要提供實際損失金額,似乎又唔覺有,因為對方只係唔賠訂.

1. No in most of the case.

It is difficult to tell if the time frame is reasonable or not. However, given that you actually did not provide any proof of income, it definitely does not look good on you.

2. No - it is based on your agreement. If there is no agreement, it is assumed that the information is available before the official lease is signed.

3. Let me put it this way - I don't see a reason why you can win this case. At the least, you fail to demonstrate any negligence by the landlord.

4. Unfortunately, all real estate transactions must be in writing. This is a perfect example of an exception to any verbal agreements.

5. Time and money you spent on the case.

我會懷疑佢地行騙, 選擇去報案室備案.......

你簽租約要入息證明? 未聽過，個人私隱噃，冇咁簡單俾人睇，如果要，咁你亦要業主屋契證明，至夠保障。

2014-04-08 20:45:20 補充：
但佢係收咗錢，收咗錢就要守約，法律只是簡單的是與非，有做或冇做，沒有程度，你有單有據，應該有得打。