家事法庭 - 今日被自己個律師迫自己和解

2014-04-05 12:22 pm
在下的律師之前明明口頭及書面同本人講會在第一堂預審PTR申請入過份經濟陳述書、追問對方未回答既問題及交出未提交既証明文件 (大量)。到今日上庭,突然話因為之前本人入既答案 (answers to questionnaire) 有欺騙政府津貼之內容,而對方又出信 "恐嚇" 會報警。未同我商量就同對方律師傾,傾完就話要我比一個大數目,而喱個數目又係在下供一到退休都供唔到既數目。跟住兩個律師不停精神炸我,要我即做決定,否則對方報警。在下一時驚,答咗張好多塗改液既和解書,要我比大律金錢。而家好後悔,想入紙踢咗佢再開庭審。請問在下可以點做? (在下會先向法庭自己陳述自己講大話既地方)

回答 (2)

2014-04-05 2:32 pm
✔ 最佳答案
Totally bullshit.

1. When you provide a falsified statement to the court (in any capacities), it is known as perjury, a criminal offense. Regardless, the HKSAR Government can independently charge you. Unless the immunity agreement is provided by the Department of Justice, no one has authority to say not to charge you.

In simply saying, even you agree with the lawyers, they can still throw you to the police. Beside - by failing to report to the police, the lawyers may have committed obstruction of justice (as lawyers are obligated to report).

Please note - incorrect statements do not necessary mean it is a falsified statements.

2. When you have defrauded the HKSAR Government, damage has been done already. There is nothing you can do.

Bottom line - you need a lawyer for your interest.



2014-04-09 11:48:17 補充:
1. Let me put it this way - it is the lawyer's job to protect the client. So lawyers tend to press other people other than their own clients, especially people without legal representation.

2. It is difficult to say.

2014-04-13 16:06:16 補充:
No comment.

However, always keep in mind - the judge is the one controling the court, not the lawyers.

You are not obligated to listen to lawyers.

2014-04-14 04:44:33 補充:
So?

2014-04-18 14:45:49 補充:
1. No idea. But I am certain you are way too passive - no one forces you to have this meeting. At the same time - if they don't allow your mother to get in, you can certainly refuse the meeting.

They are lawyers, not judges. They can't force you.

2014-04-18 14:46:56 補充:
2. No - but if asked, you have to give a reason on why.

2014-04-19 00:41:41 補充:
1. If you can prove what you have said, no.

2. No - unless the statute of limitation has passed.

3. No comment. It depends on your legal basis. In considering any request, the court will consider the legal basis more than the facts.

4. No if you know what you are doing.

2014-04-19 06:15:39 補充:
Sorry.

1. If you can prove what you have said, then the answer is yes.

4. Your chance of winning depends on if you know what you are doing. Please note - even lawyers may not know what they are doing.
2014-07-30 4:30 am
這里很不錯aaashops。com老婆很喜歡
县乭倸刄

收錄日期: 2021-04-13 21:17:33
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20140405000051KK00027

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份