取消酒席,被酒樓要求賠償(急)

1. Yes, as a right. However, in order to make a case against you, it depends on other circumstances as well, such as:

a. The restaurant can't sue for estimated total, but actual loss.

b. If the restaurant acts in good faith or not (Has the restaurant made any attempt to minimize its loss?)

Although it sounds like scare tactics, the restaurant has the right.

2. No - as they are in interest in this case.

3. Never heard does not mean never happen. Since a lot of cases are settled in a confidential matter, there is no way to tell.

1. 其實真係好多人有誤會,以為訂金可作賠償,除非有特別訂明,否則應約及要約雙方都需要完成合約,而合約通常由酒家提供,難以會有對佢地不利既條款.

2. B經理講呢類說話係冇機會成本,比人告果個係你而唔會係佢.

3. 錯,係一定追究,因為追討成本低.而多數情況下,雙方係可以傾掂了事,但你亦要有誠意,始終你係負左人.

*希望大家都明白咩叫合約精神,包括婚姻,唔好隨便答應人,但答應左,就唔好見利而反口.

你兩邊都簽，即係食兩家，A對你採取行動，B一樣會做，問題係你唔信邊個，大不了男女家分開擺，圍數可有彈性，你冇違約就可以。