本人在香港售賣國內生產的一種電器。
這電器已經在國內及香港也註冊了商標，
此生產廠家已經在香港有代理商，
而因為有代理商的問題，廠家不再供應產品給我。
本人只能透過國內其他經銷商入貨到香港售賣。
1，請問如果我繼續售賣此產品，是否侵權？
2，我在網絡上賣廣告，產品圖片說明等等也是從此廠家的網站下載的，這是否侵權？
3，香港很多水貨，例如三星手機去韓國入貨，
但為什麼能夠公開售賣而沒有讓三星控訴侵權呢？
我是否能夠以水貨形式售賣呢？
期待有人能夠解答此問題，無限感激！
關於產品侵權問題，十萬火急：
2014-02-21 2:36 am
回答 (3)
2014-02-21 6:33 am
✔ 最佳答案
1. 其實香港好多牌子都係自己做品牌,件產品就由國內廠家生產,基本上各有各做,唔係侵權,除非你連人地個品牌都拎埋黎用.2. 唔算,因為你的確係透過呢間工廠去生產.
3. 水貨唔同假貨,水貨只係冇經香港代理進口既貨,所以三星既水貨,其實都係三星既產品.
*但間廠有冇抄人地既其他專利,你要自己問下佢,香港係冇直接註冊專利,大陸就好似有大約50個專利範疇.
2014-03-03 8:25 am
快去這里*****我每次都是去這里看
佶厔厗勬傛
佶厔厗勬傛
2014-02-21 12:48 pm
1. Yes.
The reason is Hong Kong's Copyright Ordinance is constructed so narrowly. Basically unless you have an express approval of the copyright holder, anything you do can constitute a copyright infringement.
2. Yes.
3. The main reason is Samsung did not make a complaint to Customs and Excise Department. In many instances, Customs and Excise Department does not act unless there is a complaint.
Also - even it is illegal, Samsung still benefits from the sale of mobile phones imported directly from Korea.
Basically, Samsung allows this due to commercial reasons.
In your case, you can do what you want as soon as no one complains.
The reason is Hong Kong's Copyright Ordinance is constructed so narrowly. Basically unless you have an express approval of the copyright holder, anything you do can constitute a copyright infringement.
2. Yes.
3. The main reason is Samsung did not make a complaint to Customs and Excise Department. In many instances, Customs and Excise Department does not act unless there is a complaint.
Also - even it is illegal, Samsung still benefits from the sale of mobile phones imported directly from Korea.
Basically, Samsung allows this due to commercial reasons.
In your case, you can do what you want as soon as no one complains.
收錄日期: 2021-04-20 14:58:23
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20140220000051KK00087