Why patent within a monopoly?

2014-02-13 8:55 pm
I recently came across the question:
9 Which one of the following is most likely to be a source of monopoly power?
A The employment of additional workers by a firm as it increases its size
B The existence of diseconomies of scale at high levels of output
C The granting of a patent to a pharmaceutical company for a newly developed drug
D The merger of two small firms in a large industry

To which the answer was C, the granting of a patent.
But why, if a firm is in a monopoly would they need to patent?
Surely they are the most demanded, have access to the best R&D and are capable of producing whatever the patented good is far better than any other company allowing them to charge a cheaper price and maximise profits competitively. Thus no need for patenting. Moreover, why not C?

回答 (2)

2014-02-16 12:49 pm
✔ 最佳答案
The answer is C because a patent means that the product cannot be reproduced elsewhere for a certain period of time. This is a reward for your R&D and is fair because R&D would be disincentivised (i.e. people will no longer be driven to research and develop) if you spent millions on developing a product and another company just copied your product which saves them lots of money. Hence a patent basically gives you monopoly power as there is no other firm that can reproduce your product, and hence anyone that wants your product in the time period that the patent exists can only buy it from you (and hence you can charge whatever price you want). I hope that makes sense xd

Lets look at the other answers:
A: It is true that a firm will employ additional workers, but this surely will just increase cost. Furthermore, how does this give them monopoly power? - Possible but doesn't seem the logical answer

B: This statement is true but this means that there will be higher costs and hence making the firm less competitive. This will definitely not give you monopoly power. - This is definitely the wrong answer.

C: As explained above, this seems the most logical answer.

D: The merger of two firms will give monopoly power because they will own a bigger percentage of the market and have greater market power, but since the question says that it is a large industry, we can safely assume that this merger will not have too big an effect and hence wont yield too much monopoly power.

Therefore, the verdict is that C is the most correct answer and is most likely to give a source of monopoly power, and hence C would be the answer of choice :)

Hope that helped xd
2014-02-14 10:35 am
Your logic escapes me. The question is "which is the SOURCE of the monopoly power". The patent itself give them the monopoly for that invention for that country.

Were it not for the patent, anyone having the necessary chemistry skills could simply reverse-engineer the drug, make a knock-off and sell at a market price. So much for the monopoly.


收錄日期: 2021-04-13 20:00:23
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20140213125534AAUeb6F

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份