英文句子翻釋&文法問題~! Thx~

2014-02-07 6:29 am
1.The only way to move forward is to stop looking back.
為有個兩動詞(move and is)?文法錯了嗎?或是一種文法結構?

2.For those of you that are depressed and upset about where you are today with the descisions you've made in the past.
請盡量照字面同流暢地翻釋,同解釋with係呢句中的角色,解釋

3.Safty always comes first in diving.
請盡量照字面同流暢地翻釋

4.係同一篇文, 如果想番前面提及既野,用this,these 定that,thoes?

5.The changes given to you is correct.
given 不是過去分詞嗎,前面唔係應該要加have, has?
或是一種文法結構?

回答 (3)

2014-02-08 12:33 am
✔ 最佳答案
1.The only way to move forward is to stop looking back.
為有個兩動詞(move and is)?文法錯了嗎?或是一種文法結構?

你對英語的句法理解有點基礎上的誤會/未清楚,句子的動詞不是單單看詞本身是不是動詞的詞語;為何你沒有看出句中還有stop和look都是動詞詞語?而move是有一個to字連住的,跟to stop一樣的詞性,這叫infinitive(不定詞/不定式「動詞」)而不是句子結構的動詞。

講完詞便要講句的結構:你應該用句子中詞句的小組合作為理解或拆解句子的方法而不是用詞語的本質或形態:讀這句時「The only way to move forward」構成一小組可以理解的意思大約是「向前行或前進的唯一方法/路向」,接著如你所提看到is這個原形動詞(由於它是最原始的動詞-所以99%它都會是句的主動詞),對於is你必定知道它的意思是類似「是/係/實在」;於是跳接再看is之後的句組(心裏要留住以前句組的意思作為參考)的詞語組合意思大約是「去停止/阻止/防止看以前(look back可以是看後面,但這裏英語的phrasal verb借用為回顧或留戀往事。)無論你能否明解每組字的細緻意思,但全句只是有兩組重點意思構成:1. to move forward; 2. to stop looking back。句子就像最簡單的句子s + v +o,而is便是動詞,the …way(n)便是subject(主詞),looking back (phrase)便像是object(受詞)…中間夾著的to x, to y是幫助形容/處理這些固定的名詞/片語。
2.For those of you that are depressed and upset about where you are today with the decisions you've made in the past.
請盡量照字面同流暢地翻釋,同解釋with係呢句中的角色,解釋
先說了with 的角色/功能是附註/延伸句子主題中對自己depress和upset about的範圍…

至於你們這些由於你們過去所做的決定而對於自己今時今日的狀況感到鬱悶和惆悵的人。

3.Safty always comes first in diving.
請盡量照字面同流暢地翻釋

潛水是要安全至上的。

4.係同一篇文, 如果想番前面提及既野,用this,these 定that,thoes?

前面提過可以考慮用that, those;但是未必一定的,還要考慮當你寫的這句中提及的野跟這句中的動詞/句式的關係,假如意思指示式/描述式的則會用this/these,但假如是敘述式的,則用that/those會比較合適。因為用this/that/these/those都是單獨一字,要附上那野,即是寫法上是THESE野,或THOSE野,所以回到基本文法和字詞原則是,句子的內容是近的便是THESE野,講的意思/空間是離得遠的便用THOSE野

5.The changes given to you is correct.
given 不是過去分詞嗎,前面唔係應該要加have, has?
或是一種文法結構?

分析對!但應該的答案不對!全句應該是The changes that are given (或have been given) to you is incorrect.
留意主動詞用is嚴格來說應該是”are”,因為changes是眾數,但我估計這句是現代英語和它要指出的是「給了你這些更正的所有/全部都是錯」,所以因此寫了is。這點可以考究一下有待明白。
2014-02-07 7:50 pm
1. The only way to move forward is to stop looking back.
為有個兩動詞(move and is)?文法錯了嗎?或是一種文法結構?
A: “The only way to move forward”係一個phrase, 你可以當佢係一個個體. 所以"move”係li句句子入面唔係verb, “is”先係.

2. For those of you that are depressed and upset about where you are today with the descisions you've made in the past.
請盡量照字面同流暢地翻釋,同解釋with係呢句中的角色,解釋
A:對於個d為自己過去決定而後悔同失望嘅人,….
Li句唔係完整句子, 後面應該仲有, 但係可能句子太長, 佢先用左.”去結束一半句子先, 避免人地睇唔明/亂. “with”係到係一個preposition, 用黎加info 入一句句子入面.

3. Safty always comes first in diving.
請盡量照字面同流暢地翻釋
A: 駕駛時安全第一.

4. 係同一篇文, 如果想番前面提及既野,用this,these 定that,thoes?
A: 你首先要知道this these that those li 4個單字點解,
this 這個 / these 這些 / that 那個 / those那些
唔係每句都用得嫁, 要解比你聽要一段時間, 唔係1 , 2日可以搞點- -

5. The changes given to you is correct.
given 不是過去分詞嗎,前面唔係應該要加have, has?
或是一種文法結構?
A: 同第1題問題一樣, “The changes given to you”係一個phrase, 一個個體.
你都可以寫成”The changes that are given to you is correct.” 不過當你英文進步都某個水平, 你就發覺好多英文字太重疊, 會令到睇果一個人好煩. 小學老師會咁教你, 因為你一定唔會錯, 但係到中學之後, 佢地就覺得你應該要識得點用英文字,

希望以上幫到你啦~^^~
我平時都有幫人補習, 如果你有需要可以pm我呀~~
2014-02-07 7:43 pm
1.The only way to move forward is to stop looking back.
為有個兩動詞(move and is)?文法錯了嗎?或是一種文法結構?

2.For those of you that are depressed and upset about where you are today with the descisions you've made in the past.
請盡量照字面同流暢地翻釋,同解釋with係呢句中的角色,解釋

3.Safty always comes first in diving.
請盡量照字面同流暢地翻釋

4.係同一篇文, 如果想番前面提及既野,用this,these 定that,thoes?

5.The changes given to you is correct.
given 不是過去分詞嗎,前面唔係應該要加have, has?
或是一種文法結構?





1.The only way to move forward is to stop looking back.
To have a two verbs (move and is)? Grammar mistake?, Or one kind of grammatical structure?

2.For those of you that are depressed and upset about where you are today with the descisions you've made in the past.
Please try to literally turn smoothly with the release, it explained the role of the same sentence with the Department, explaining

3.Safty always comes first in diving.
Please try to smooth literal translation of the same

4 lines with a message, if you want to mention Jiye front fan with this, these fixed that, thoes?

5.The changes given to you is correct.
given past participle is not right, it should be added in front of you agree have, has?
Or one kind of grammatical structure?


1,只有這樣,才能往前走就是停止尋找回來。
為有個兩動詞(動,並且是)?文法錯了嗎?或是一種文法結構?

2。對於那些你認為是沮喪和苦惱,你今天跟你過去所做的對策的。
請盡量照字面同流暢地翻釋,同解釋同系呢句中的角色,解釋

3.Safty永遠是第一位在潛水。
請盡量照字面同流暢地翻釋

4。系同一篇文,如果想番前面提及既野,用這個,這些定了,thoes?

給你5。改變是正確的。
鑑於不是過去分詞嗎,前面唔係應該要加都有,有?
或是一種文法結構?
參考: me


收錄日期: 2021-04-11 20:30:55
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20140206000051KK00285

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份