do you wear pants only because you have to?

2013-08-30 7:54 pm
be honest. if you didnt have to wear pants (and other clothes) in public would you? or would you just walk around nude

回答 (6)

2013-08-31 6:39 am
✔ 最佳答案
Yes. :(

It gets really hot here in south Texas and being naked is actually more comfortable. If it was normal and not shocking and people weren't perverted I would never wear pants. Lol
2013-08-31 3:08 am
What an odd question. No, I would not go around nude if I could. The nude body is exposed to germs and injury that are avoided by simply wearing clothes. Are you an exhibitionist? Our climate would interfere with not wearing clothing. Nude bodies are not attractive to others unless they are in some stage of sexual arousal. There is nothing more hilarious than the sight of a limp penis.
2013-08-31 3:40 am
No.

I'm being honest. I would prefer clothes.

It's a rough, stickery, sometimes cold, sometimes scortchingly hot world out there.
2013-08-31 3:31 am
Clothing isn't just for ornimentation. It is also protection from the elements and insects.
2013-08-31 3:03 am
pants do protect what needs to be protected......... I do not think "public" is appropriate.... but I do prefer bare when it is appropriate
2013-08-31 2:59 am
Partly yes but also so it's more comfortable.


收錄日期: 2021-04-21 18:18:51
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130830115411AApXWIN

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份