中文翻譯英文~急

2013-05-31 9:52 pm
請把以下文字翻譯,一些英文字例如: PuR3JKE1、Infinity Ward、Activision和
YouTube請直接套用到翻譯的句子中。

我認為這個影片封鎖是錯誤和不合理的。首先,相關影片中的音樂是屬於
Infinity Ward和Activision這兩間遊戲公司擁有,並不屬於PuR3JKE1這位YouTube使用者的。其次,正如我剛才所說,PuR3JKE並不是這首音樂的擁用人,他也只不是一位上傳者,他對於這首音樂並無版權可言。他這樣告我並不恰當。要是告我侵犯版權的話,應由Infinity Ward和Activision這兩間遊戲公司告我。再者,他在我影片未被封鎖前曾經說我盜用他的影片。但他至今仍然沒有證據,我已經向他解釋,並拍攝制作短片,證明該影片是我自己創造的,沒有盜取他的。可是他卻檢控我侵犯他的版權,這是蠻橫無理的做法!

他檢控我侵犯他的版權是出於他的妒忌,他不喜歡我的影片觀看次數比他多。我已把相關資料發佈至Youtube Forum中。

回答 (3)

2013-06-01 7:29 am
✔ 最佳答案
Regardingthe recent video blockage, I think it is wrong and unreasonable. First,it must be noted that the audio component of the concerned video is rightfullyowned by the game companies Infinity Ward and Activision, but not YouTube user PuR3JKE1.Therefore, PuR3JKE1 is nothing more than an uploader in thiscase and hence does not have the right to claim the copyright on the audiocomponent. It would be inappropriate for him to sue me for infringing hisso-called copyright. And even if I am to be sued, the accusing party should bethe rightful owners Infinity Ward and Activision but never PuR3JKE1. Moreover,up to now, PuR3JKE1 is still unable to provide any evidence tosupport his claim before the video blockage that I used the concerned video ofhis for other purposes without his consent. In fact, in the video I have maderecently, I have already explained my grounds and proved that the concernedvideo is indeed made by me by not him. In short, I have never used PuR3JKE1’svideos for other purposes without his consent. It is so absurd of him to accuseme of infringing his copyrights despite the fact there. PuR3JKE1 accuses me of copyright infringementbecause he is envious of my videos having more views than his. I have alreadyuploaded the relevant information to Youtube Forum to let everyone has a betterunderstanding on this matter. Thankyou so much for your understanding.
希望幫到你。
參考: 自己
2013-06-01 11:59 am
I feel that the blocking of this movie is a wrong move and unreasonable. First of all, the music of the relevant movie belongs to both Infinity Ward and Activision. The user by the name of PuR3JKE1 in Youtube has no jurisdiction over it. Moreover, PuR3JKE1 is not the owner of this music, and he is only a common Internet upload person which means he has no copyright at all. His indictment about me was inappropriate. If he has the intention of prosecuting me for copyright violation, he should have sued me under the two companies which are Infinity Ward and Activision respectively. On top of all of the aforementioned, he had accused me of stealing the film prior to the blocking, yet he had no solid evidences as of today. I had explained to him previously that the film was made by myself. But he prosecuted me for copyright violation which is a barbaric doing. His prosecution of copyright was basically due to jealously. He disliked the fact that my movie viewing frequency was higher than his. I had already posted the relevant information on the Youtube Forum.
2013-06-01 1:48 am
I think this movie is wrong and unfair blockade. First, the relevant part of the film's music is
Infinity Ward and Activision game company owns the two, who do not belong PuR3JKE1 YouTube users. Secondly, as I said earlier, PuR3JKE this music is not the owner of the employer, he is not only an upload, he had no copyright for this music at all. He told me this would not be appropriate. If accuse me of copyright infringement, then, should the two Infinity Ward and Activision game company sue me. Furthermore, he is not blocked before in my movie that I had stolen his films. But he still is no evidence, I have to explain to him, and shoot video produced to prove that the film is my own creation, he did not steal. But he was prosecuting his copyright infringement me, this is outrageous practice!

He prosecuted his copyright infringement me out of his jealousy, and he did not like my video views than he. I have already related information posted to Youtube Forum in.
參考: me


收錄日期: 2021-04-13 19:29:41
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130531000051KK00109

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份