WOULD BE BROUGHT

樓上已初步解釋了個phrase是would be brought in，是被動式的動詞片語，因為那些政策(一樣死物)是被(人)制定和引進…原形是bring in 意思不是bring帶來，而是引進或加入。另外還有其他的preposition配bring有不同意思：bring out the best of him = 發揮他的最好表現bring forth the motion = 提出動議bring back memories = 引發回憶bring into the group = 加進(一些人或實質的東西)小組內 由於那些policies並不是加進中小企的物質性東西(例如注資或減稅)，而是製造一些制度或條件來幫助它們，所以不是把policies bring into help [這樣寫意思是把policies加進一樣叫help的東西裏面)，句子的表達是將policies 引進bring in 作用是to help，這樣的句式寫法。

1. Passive Voice.

Would be bring is grammatically incorrect.

2. The whole phrase is "brought in", not brought.

It will be grammatically incorrect for using "into" (as "brought into" usually following a media (For example - The equipment was brought into "the conference room").