For those that gave me a legitimate response (even if I don't agree with it), thank you! For those that opted for the "Clueless" response, but gave no actual "Answer" to the question, you may wish to look it up in the dictionary and look in the mirror at the same time, so that you have correct context when using the phrase. Maj Kev If you really think that "The US is the ONLY country that understands what it means to use nuclear weapons", all you do is prove my point and highlight the hypocrisy to which I refer. Thank you for that. Wine Wine you dirty skunk - The terms "Once again" and "You keep throwing that out there" refer to previous submissions. I have not made any previous submissions anywhere or on this blog, Perhaps "You might want to know wtf you are talking about before running your ball washer."
You will look less stupid that way.
Howard - Agreed that the terms UN and legitimacy are on shaky ground together, but they are the International resolution provider, created (think League of Nations also) promoted and sanctioned by the USA to keep world peace I think many of you have missed my point. Believe me, I don't want crazy countries like North Korea / Iran to have these type of weapons (and yes, throwing the Hiroshima and Nagasaki usage was a fairly low blow on my part), but how do you justify the double standard? The "we can have it, but you can't" argument doesn't hold. North Korea could use the similar, justifiable arguments that the US use - protection / defence against an opposing ideology, potentially justified by the fact that they are smaller and need this technology as a deterrent to more powerful enemies. Do you get the point I'm trying to make?
