require + verb +ing

2012-09-05 7:32 am
Does the following sentence correct?

"Mr. LEE was required taking over the duty of his colleague."

Is it the same meaning as: "Mr. LEE was required to take over the duty of his colleague." ?

回答 (3)

2012-09-05 5:13 pm
✔ 最佳答案
"Mr. Lee was required taking over the duty of this colleague."

The sentence is wrong in grammar. Transitive verbs when used in passive voice cannot be followed by gerund phrases.

Active voice: Someone required Mr. Lee taking over the duty of this colleague.
(obviously, it is wrong for "required" to take two objects)
Instead, the gerund phrase (noun function) has to be converted into infinitive phrase (adverb function of purpose), as "to take over the duty...".

So, the correct sentence of passive voice should be:
Mr. Lee was required to take over the duty of his colleague.

(Note: it is acceptable for the format of "require + gerund", and the gerund is the object of "require".)

2012-09-05 4:50 pm
恐怕這句子並不正確,

其實英文裏,每個動詞都有其指定的句型,用法;如有些動詞需要participle跟隨,有些則要infinitive,有些兩者都可

而require的句型,可以是

1)V+ noun(或v-ing),如:

The suggestion requires careful thought.
The floor requires washing

2)又或者是 verb object + to-infinitive,如:

The rules also require employers to provide safety training.

3)又或者可以是 verb + that-clause,如:

The rules require that you bring only one guest to the dinner.
所以,我們看到,若用被動語氣,從2)所演變出的句型應是:subject + be + p.p + to-infinitive,如:

Bringing up children often requires you to put their needs first.

require這動詞,卻沒有subject + be + p.p + participle這用法

希望幫到你!
2012-09-05 8:28 am
The following sentence is correct:-(1)because he was required=
a participle as adverb clause equivalent.
=Taking over the duty of.....
(2) because he required=
an infinitive after to
=to take over.......


收錄日期: 2021-04-11 19:06:37
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120904000051KK00760

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份