Only different people (or groups of people) observing the same thing from different perspectives, with different opinions? I think that maybe people don't understand things as well as we'd like to believe and our complete acceptance of other people's opinions (albeit well researched and convincing) could keep us from certain truths.
I'd be grateful for your thoughts on the subject. Thank you.
Is it true that there's no such thing as wrong and right...?
2012-08-02 3:13 pm
回答 (15)
2012-08-02 3:27 pm
✔ 最佳答案
It's based on perspective. You know that saying it's the action that counts not the motive? Basically the motive gets lost and so it doesn't matter if it's right or wrong. 
2012-08-02 3:46 pm
It's hard to deny that we all know what wrong and right are. Where we disagree is in the things wherein wrong and right reside. This suggests that wrong and right are absolutes, but they serve as the source of wrong and right in the world without actually being in the world--so nothing in the world is absolute, everything is part wrong and part right. Because of that, we disagree about things in the world, because we don't say, "That particular thing is about 50% wrong and 50% right"--we call it right or we call it wrong. So then it's a matter of perspective as to which one we call it.
2012-08-02 3:38 pm
Your insight; exactly. Although, we must establish some wrongs and rights to maintain a social structure that is desirable. Of course as you recognize this may not be right for everyone but it must be established. Personally, in my opinion the biggest fallacy is when we place wrongs and rights from a deity that we have completely made up. And people follow this as a truth. Don't get me wrong, I actually do believe in ... well, for lack of a better word "god" but this god does not judge. As we clearly know, there is no such thing as wrong or right ;-]
2012-08-02 3:37 pm
You will accept to cosider the following:
For example, some scientific discoveries are accepted and adopted and followed as right until some other group of scientists later come out with more proof that the earlier discovery was wrong; and from this moment the right becomes wrong and the wrong becomes right!. As long as there is left there should be right. Therefore if there is wrong there should be right which later turns to be otherwise which is a continuous process!
For example, some scientific discoveries are accepted and adopted and followed as right until some other group of scientists later come out with more proof that the earlier discovery was wrong; and from this moment the right becomes wrong and the wrong becomes right!. As long as there is left there should be right. Therefore if there is wrong there should be right which later turns to be otherwise which is a continuous process!
2012-08-02 3:36 pm
A group of aliens visit Earth and take personal offence that stealing is a crime, of course an Atheist would respond like that.
Christians believe that morality (right and wrong) is given by God, so therefore there is such a thing as right and wrong.
Christians believe that morality (right and wrong) is given by God, so therefore there is such a thing as right and wrong.
2016-07-25 4:26 pm
False. Ethically there are such things. Philosophically, that you would be able to answer that your self. Actual. Universally after loss of life your little physique shall be feeding a 3 and be break up into smaller hundreds of thousands of components that will be mutated into one of a kind chemicals to be able to turn out to be a part of the ecosystem, and the universe in the end. Whether you're correct or wrong, philosophically.
2012-08-02 9:40 pm
There are distinct differences between what I consider right and what I consider wrong.
I view their differences in terms of what is beneficial and what is detrimental in life and to life.
There are times when knowing the difference can become difficult to discern, but without right and wrong there would be less knowledge and thus less wisdom and understanding.
Not knowing right from wrong can and does cause unimaginable pain and suffering.
Ignorance doesn't justify ignorance.
I view their differences in terms of what is beneficial and what is detrimental in life and to life.
There are times when knowing the difference can become difficult to discern, but without right and wrong there would be less knowledge and thus less wisdom and understanding.
Not knowing right from wrong can and does cause unimaginable pain and suffering.
Ignorance doesn't justify ignorance.
2012-08-02 7:03 pm
Every countries governments must consider the human rights of the people that live in that country.. given that countries unique circumstances and economic situation... to ensure that the suffering of all humans and animals is kept to the absolute minimum possible.. and that basic human rights and dignities are respected to the absolute maximum possible... and that everything possible is done to ensure the survival of the natural environment for the sake of all humanity and future generations.
2012-08-02 5:06 pm
There's truth of reasoning and truth of fact. There has to be an infinite analysis to pinpoint the 'wrong and right' occurrences.
2012-08-02 4:38 pm
Imagine this.
If you are a good enough lawyer, Murder is technically protected by the First constitutional right.
If you are a good enough lawyer, Murder is technically protected by the First constitutional right.
參考: Logic'd
:P
2012-08-02 4:30 pm
If you were the only human left on earth not knowing what was right from wrong, would you be able to commit any of the two? things that are right, and those that are wrong, there just perspectives that people from the past have given to situations they agreed or did not agree too, we as humans are entitled to everything, we have the choice to perceive anything we want wether it be the right thing or not
收錄日期: 2021-04-13 18:53:30
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120802071337AASJEf7