There are many Gospels which have been discovered which have not been incorporated into the Bible. Obviously the church does not want us to read these conflicting versions which in some cases give a completely different story to the life of Christ to the one which we are all accustomed to and challenges the very basic beliefs of the church. When so many stories have been written it must surely be difficult to prove which versions are the right ones, if any at all, and very easy to say that the the stories which do not fall into the accepted version, have been made up etc for whatever reason. Given the fact that all these scriptures were written many years after the event happened, (we all know the result when chinese whispers is played) and the fact that there are so many different stories, written at the same time, if not before he ones published in the Bible, how can Christians justify totally ignoring all the evidence in all the other Gosples that have been written and believing only the ones in the Bible?
更新1:
Couple of points .. how can you guarantee that none of the Gosples are counterfeit? How can stories of Jesus's childhood not possibly have a place in scripture? Are you suggesting that Gods "inspired word" should not include the stories of his son when he was a teenager? What has he got to hide?
