Should a noun complement clause closely follow its preceding noun?

2012-05-04 3:53 pm
I came across this sentence in a renowned dictionary.

"The thought crosses my mind that she might be taking drugs"

I wonder if the noun complement clause above (i.e. that she might be taking drugs) is completing the noun

A) My 'mind', which immediately precedes the clause or
B) The 'thought', which is removed from the noun complement clause

To me, B seems more correct, we can rephrase the sentence like this,

The thought that she might be taking drugs crosses my mind

Can I analyse in this way or should a noun complement clause only complete its immediately preceding noun?

Thanks in advance

回答 (2)

2012-05-04 4:24 pm
✔ 最佳答案
"That she might be taking drugs" is a subject complement for "thought," not "mind," which is an object (of "crosses").
2016-05-18 1:03 pm
I agree with your analysis. To use your example: He had no intention OF finishing the assignment, works perfectly well. As does: He's having DIFFICULTY/PROBLEMS/A LAUGH/HYSTERICS finishing the assignment." All of which demonstrate that 'trouble' is not an exception here. I think that the rule you cite: "of" + -ing clause can equally well be used without the 'of'' as we have demonstrated. Thanks for the question.


收錄日期: 2021-04-30 23:38:34
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120504075304AAH6ggw

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份