✔ 最佳答案
You would be weightless in the centre of a planet if a suitable space could be provided because as you suggest, the pull would be outwards in all directions. The pull of gravity is greatest on the surface where the whole planet's mass provides the force. Then the pull of gravity reduces again as you move further away into space.
Looking at your question, you seem to be suggesting that a universe which is static, and in which everything is shrinking; could look exactly the same as the conventional view of a universe which is expanding and everything in it remains the same size. The problem as I see it would be the speed of light would have to be shrinking at the same rate as the universe, because that is our scale for distance measurements of stars and galaxies in units of light years. Also, particle accelerators seem to confirm the history of the universe as beginning with a big bang, whereas a static universe in which everything is shrinking would require a different theoretical origin.
A planet or star is not a black hole. Every mass has a Schwartzschild radius into which, if you could squeeze that mass, gravity would overcome all other forces and it would collapse inward to form a black hole. Any astronomical body described otherwise is not a black hole.