翻譯成英文...thx!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2011-12-14 8:19 am
只翻譯中文 文法要對哦...thx


我是一名商科學生,上"Automotive engineeing principles"課堂我會感到困難,因為要有 science backgrounds 先可以跟上"Automotive engineeing principles"課堂的進度,但只要花多點額外時間來做練習,不明白課堂的內容問老師,這樣"Automotive engineeing principles"課堂的內容就能明白了我覺得適合讀engineering的人要對engineering有興趣.for example,他平常會看engineering有關的書或有關的新聞,因為他有對engineering有興趣,而興趣可作為一種推動力,所以對學習engineeing有優勢
文科生相比理科生在語言文法方面有優勢,更容易明白題目或老師講的內容.for example,在長題目方面可以快理解,可以清楚表達答案
我們一致認為學生無需有 science backgrounds,才可以學engineering.因為對有興趣而無 science backgrounds 的學生不公平,可能阻礙他們在這方面的發展和事業和前途

回答 (3)

2011-12-15 12:55 am
✔ 最佳答案
kitfai,您好!您的問題解答如下:

英譯如下:

I am a student of business studies and take the class of Automotive Engineering Principles that make me feel difficult. It is because the science basic is essential for keeping up the schedule of the class of Automotive Engineering Principles. As a student of business studies, I have to spend more time for doing exercise and asking teachers problems about the class to understand its contents as well.

I think that people are interesting in engineering are more suitable to study engineering. For example, a person usually reads books and watches news for engineering owing to his or her interest in engineering and the interest is the driving force and advantage in studying engineering.

Arts students with an advantage in language that compare with science students and that make arts students more easily to learn topics and contents that the teachers teach. For example, arts students understand long questions faster and can make the answers known more clearly.

We totally agree that it is not necessary to have science background for students who study engineering. Because it is not fair for the students are interesting in engineering but without science background and that may hold back their development in the engineering region and the prospects in their careers.


(原文不明字詞意思皆查自網上。並請恕我才淺,譯得不大好而未能譯得更貼切順暢,且只能依照大意而未能依照字面意思翻譯。還請多多包涵。如有錯漏,望祈指正)



**希望能夠對您有幫助**
**上述解答雖係網上,但還請尊重本人,不要予以抄襲和拷貝**

2011-12-15 21:06:45 補充:
對不起,英譯的第4段的 "We totally agree that" 有錯,更正為 "Unanimously, we agree that",請留意。
參考: 苗克阿肯
2011-12-14 8:57 pm
I am a business student, on the "Automotive engineeing principles" classroom I would be difficult because first you canhave science backgrounds to keep up with "Automotive engineeing principles" progress in the classroom, but as long asspend more extra time to do exercise, do not understand theteacher asked the class content, so "Automotive engineeing principles" will be able to understand the content of classroom
I think for people who want to read engineering engineeringinterest. For example, he will usually look for books orengineering-related news, because he had on the engineeringinterest, and interest as a driving force, so there is learningengineeing superiority

Liberal arts students than science students have an advantage in the language grammar, a better understanding of the subject orthe teacher about the content. For example, in the long side canquickly understand the subject, you can clearly answer

We agree that students do not have science backgrounds, canlearn engineering. Because without science backgrounds are interested in the students do not fair, this may hinder theirdevelopment and career and future
2011-12-14 8:48 am
As a commercial student,AEP cannot often be understood without scientific background.
The engine student should be entrusted to an interest in engine..
The Arts student can understand and answer quick when he receives a long question;although he has no scientific background.


收錄日期: 2021-04-16 13:46:50
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20111214000051KK00017

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份