有關民事訴訟被拘捕的問題?

1. It will only happen when there is an indication that the testimony and/or evidence suggesting crimes have been committed.

For instance, lying (obstruction of justice/contempt of the court), financial record (tax evasion).

2. No.

3. Not in a direct way.

A small claims judgment is not good enough to retrain the defendant from leaving Hong Kong. However, if you intend to declare the defendant bankrupt, and the bankrupt application has been approved, the defendant will not be able to travel as a condition of the bankruptcy.

2011-10-31 01:30:54 補充：
The answer is no, unless the debt itself was created from a criminal act.

What you can do is force him into bankruptcy.

小熊維尼 網友你好！先謝過你的來郵！
由於問題的答案已有其他網友提供正確的資訊，故請恕在下不再重覆！

小熊兄: 多謝email. gary兄己答你, 答案非常正確, 小弟不重複啦.

2011-10-30 18:56:45 補充：
債仔被判敗訴但賴皮或潛水, 債主只可以用各種追債手段 (例如 garnishee order, writ of fieri facias, 收數佬... 等)去追佢債. 欠債唔還並非蓄意詐騙, 警方唔會理.

1.除非他同時犯了刑事罪，才會拘捕，但與民事訴訟案件無關聯。
2.警方不會介入的，若冇出庭，法庭有執達吏找他，但不保證可找到。
小額錢債的勝方，法庭不會接受你申請禁制令，若其係刑事通緝，或欠大額稅款，便不能離。