✔ 最佳答案
to students:
they may be in favour of the idea because 4-day school means more holidays and more recreation. but if it comes with prolonged school hours and increased workload (self-study, assignments and tests etc) they may not support. as of peer interactions, some students love school because they can meet their schoolmates/classmates/friends, but as communication technology gets more advanced, they can easily catch up with their peers updates online, so this consideration is lessened.
to teachers:
they may find it harder to cover the entire syllabi as the number of school days reduces (but if school hours are lengthened the problem is negligible). shortened schooling also means teachers have less time to communicate with students vis-a-vis, and in-depth discussions or counseling (of academic studies/personal crises) may be hindered. they may also agree with the policy because they can have more time for lesson preparation.
to parents:
they may worry whether teachers can finish syllabi on time, and they actually wish their children can be in school as much as possible. for some working parents who have no other person to take care of their kids (i.e. they take them to school and pick them up after school every day), the policy is desirable because their worries are minimized. **if school is shortened to 4 days, they may require their kids to spend more time on tutorials or ECAs
to hk:
if students are used to attending school on 4 days only, they may not be accustomed to the employment culture of 5-day work or take for granted extensive days-off and light workload/burden, which may undercut the hk labour force''s competitiveness.
anyhow, i think the most important thing is whether quality is maintained. if you have to delve into specific impacts, i think you can consider the definitive difference between 4-day and 5-day school. does knowledge absorption matters most? or interactive learning? or whatever...? i think the discussion lies in these details.