In regards to natural selection?

2011-09-05 6:43 am
Being that it's widely known in the science community that RNA & DNA could not have been formed via natural selection alone, what is the name of the theory most atheists believe was the step between the singularity or abiogenesis, etc that started the universe, and the first forms of life?
更新1:

http://www.rae.org/natsel.html

回答 (11)

2011-09-05 6:58 am
✔ 最佳答案
They will tell you that is was evolution and that it happened over millions of years....what they won't tell you is that

How did intelligence get into the DNA and RNA in the first place? Rubbing two rocks together will not create intelligence. Soaking them in solution only gets them wet. So where did the intelligence come from?

Did they mention that a DNA sample the size of a pin head holds more information then books stacked on top of each other, miles and miles and miles long? That the stack would go out past the moon and then some?

That is a lot of information in a pin head sized DNA. Where did it come from?

I can put rocks into a library and they will not get smart....in fact speaking of non living matter, all the books in a library are dumb, even with all that information available...why don't these books get intelligence?

There was life...granted. But where that life came from is what holds the key... and science cannot create life, for all their efforts... they make a vessel, but cannot make life...Life comes into things that require it. Like a house, build it and it is empty, but people move in, it has life. That, is how it works..

Intelligence came first...then life. For without intelligence, life would have no place to stay...Why?
A vessel needs to be built for the life...this requires intelligence. A one cell creature, is still a design, isn't it? It has a shape, doesn't it? I has a substance, doesn't it? So, it must then have intelligence in order for this to happen....Thus....DESIGN.

Now, we have design, and now we can make our vessel...and into our vessel, we put life...

And once we have life, we can then change it... more intelligence, and more design...and we then make something to meet the needs of what we want.

Dust cannot do any of this. Science knows it...but...what can I say.?
2011-09-05 6:45 am
Yes chemistry formed DNA and RNA.
2011-09-05 6:46 am
Err....must have missed that paper in Nature. Got a citation?
2011-09-05 6:48 am
"Being that it's widely known"

Why is it that every time someone uses this phrase it's often in conjunction with an idea most scientists have never heard of?
2011-09-05 6:48 am
Better update your info, sweetie. RNA can form under easily reproduced circumstances with just a few basic chemicals.
2011-09-05 6:48 am
You need to look up "natural selection".
2011-09-05 6:53 am
Umm what? It is WIDELY known that RNA and DNA CAN and HAVE started alone via BASIC biochemical interactions after constants in the universe were cemented after the big bang.

RNA preceded DNA, all you need is a crapload of die throws and eventually you'll get DNA.
2011-09-05 6:46 am
Answer: "Millions and millions of years" (Yes, that's the quid pro quo of evolutionary currency).
2011-09-05 6:44 am
they call it evolution regardless
2011-09-05 6:49 am
Yes, there is a God.
2011-09-05 6:48 am
I guess one just has to "believe" in the theory (whatever it is).


收錄日期: 2021-04-20 18:56:11
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110904224345AAR799v

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份