Kill bin Laden , do you think that is victory to United States?

2011-09-03 6:12 pm

回答 (8)

2011-09-03 6:28 pm
✔ 最佳答案
Yes. Bin Laden still had plenty of evil plans against the USA. He had lots of money and support to carry them out. Probably the best killing of a leader since Hitler committed suicide.
2011-09-03 6:27 pm
you might AS WELL CALL IT A VICTORY.AMERICA IS A STRANGER TO VICTORIES.
AMERICA MISSED THE FIRST WORLD WAR
WAS LATE FOR SECOND WORLD WAR
BUT IT COULD SELL US MATERIALS TO KEEP FIGHTING
IT GOT A REAL BEATING IN VIETNAM
HARK HARK I HEAR THE PATTER OF LITTLE FEET
IT IS ONLY THE AMERICANS ON THE RETREAT
參考: HISTORY
2011-09-03 6:15 pm
Sure was not a victory for bin Laden now was it?
2011-09-03 6:15 pm
The blood of those bin laden killed on 9/11 is on Slick Willie Clinton's head.

HE refused to kill that a$$wipe when the CIA located him on THREE occasions.

Bin laden needed killing twenty-five years ago.
2011-09-03 6:18 pm
Yes, although it was long overdue.
2011-09-03 6:14 pm
Yes I do.
2011-09-04 7:19 pm
No, of course it's not.
They had no rights to execute someone, who "might" be Osama Bin Laden. They haven't managed to prove that it was in fact Bin Laden - they only say they have proof - but of course not available to anyone. You can't just execute every dark man who has a long beard - that's not legal. The real Bin Laden has probably been dead for many years.
And I'm sorry to tell you, but Bin Laden isn't very likely to have planned the 9/11 attacks. You have to be a genius in order to plan such successful attacks - I'm not saying they weren't terrible crimes - it's just that I doubt that a physically ill man from Afghanistan was capable of planning them.
參考: fbi.com
2011-09-03 6:55 pm
Did this even need to be asked?

How in any stretch of the imagination would it be a good idea to let the scumbag live?

收錄日期: 2021-05-01 13:46:11
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110903101244AArCaxC

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份