Is this sentence grammatically wrong?

I think Taylor has it right

no, tay-tay is right. move on, there's bigger fish to fry.

Technically, they're the two completely advantageous. a million) "could be" and "could be" are the two idiomatic English, which potential certainly "that is mandatory which you're X". there is not any discernible distinction between the two. 2) as that is written, the sentence means which you have a catalogue of strategies, and that this record consists of (yet isn't unavoidably constrained to) workout, sleep, and good ingesting. each and all of the products on your lists is a noun, so which you're advantageous there. you ought to use a colon re-write the sentence as: "indexed below are my stated strategies: actual routines, sufficient sleep and a nicely-balanced." although, that is not any longer mandatory, and the sentence fragment after the colon makes it extra awkward, imho.

I think that the song is right. The way you changed it sounds awkward and wrong.

No, Taylor Swift had it right to begin with.

No, she's right and you are wrong.