i am wondering which one of these method is more effective for soccer endurance?
doing many short sprints or long-distance running?
or should i do both?
which one is more useful for soccer stamina?
2011-01-28 12:45 am
回答 (7)
2011-01-28 3:34 am
✔ 最佳答案
Depends on your position. If you are forward, you would benefit from sprints, if you are a midfielder/halfback, then long distance and sprints are good. I would recommend doing both though.
參考: Soccer player
2016-02-25 4:56 pm
I would recommend doing plyometrics for all of these except power, that will have to be done via weight training or eating certain foods that give you energy.
2011-01-28 5:27 am
short distance will come with long distance. Ihave no idea if the other people answering even know a thing or two about soccer but take it from me, a Class A State Champion. DISTANCE. You can take a guess at how much running an average soccer player does but i can garuantee you that your wrong. They run about 7.5 miles a game. If you can run a half mile under 3 minutes and then 2.5 miles under 18 minutes then your fine.
2011-01-28 1:59 am
It depends kinda..because both work different muscles and build different types of endurance. Therefore, they're both equally effective methods for building endurance. So, I'd say do both!
2011-01-28 1:40 am
long distance and sprinting will defiantly help
2011-01-28 1:18 am
Im a forward so to me at least sprinting is way more important but both are really essential.
2011-01-28 12:52 am
do a bit of both
收錄日期: 2021-04-30 23:41:31
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110127164518AAUX9XR