topicMany old buildings are protected by law because they are part of a nation’s history. However, some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?
我怕自己解錯題~所以想請人幫手解~~
同埋可唔可以俾一d suggest我點寫~~??
大約寫300字~~
搵人幫我解英文作文題目~
2010-12-02 3:07 am
回答 (3)
2010-12-02 4:59 am
✔ 最佳答案
你好～～～先給你解一解你的題目～～
Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of a nation’s history. However, some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?
很多古舊建築都是一個國家的歷史，所以有法律保護。
但是，有些人則認為舊建築物應該被篩走，取而代之的應該是新的高樓大廈，因為人需要屋及辨公室。
那麼，保存舊建築物有多重要？歷史應該阻止新樓宇的發展嗎？
這條題目，你先定下你自己的立場，例如贊成。
之後再舉兩至三個有力論點，我給你一個作參考︰
As the old buildings are the collective memory of citizens, they will lose the connection between their neighbours or somebody that is related to these buildings.
以上再加以闡述，可加例子，如用皇后碼頭那些例子。
如果想加強說服力，可以用反證。
即從另一方拿取一個論點，之後再擊破它。
Introduction + Main body(3 - 4 paragraphs) + Conclusion(重申立場)，則可以成為一篇文～
希望可以幫到你～～～～～
2010-12-07 13:46:51 補充：
三樓那位人兄真是強..將我的回答發揚光大呢～有兩次．．
參考: Yogi
2010-12-05 7:42 am
你好～～～
先給你解一解你的題目～～
Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of a nation’s history. However, some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?
很多古舊建築都是一個國家的歷史，所以有法律保護。
但是，有些人則認為舊建築物應該被篩走，取而代之的應該是新的高樓大廈，因為人需要屋及辨公室。
那麼，保存舊建築物有多重要？歷史應該阻止新樓宇的發展嗎？
這條題目，你先定下你自己的立場，例如贊成。
之後再舉兩至三個有力論點，我給你一個作參考︰
As the old buildings are the collective memory of citizens, they will lose the connection between their neighbours or somebody that is related to these buildings.
以上再加以闡述，可加例子，如用皇后碼頭那些例子。
如果想加強說服力，可以用反證。
即從另一方拿取一個論點，之後再擊破它。
Introduction + Main body(3 - 4 paragraphs) + Conclusion(重申立場)，則可以成為一篇文～你好～～～
先給你解一解你的題目～～
Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of a nation’s history. However, some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?
很多古舊建築都是一個國家的歷史，所以有法律保護。
但是，有些人則認為舊建築物應該被篩走，取而代之的應該是新的高樓大廈，因為人需要屋及辨公室。
那麼，保存舊建築物有多重要？歷史應該阻止新樓宇的發展嗎？
這條題目，你先定下你自己的立場，例如贊成。
之後再舉兩至三個有力論點，我給你一個作參考︰
As the old buildings are the collective memory of citizens, they will lose the connection between their neighbours or somebody that is related to these buildings.
以上再加以闡述，可加例子，如用皇后碼頭那些例子。
如果想加強說服力，可以用反證。
即從另一方拿取一個論點，之後再擊破它。
Introduction + Main body(3 - 4 paragraphs) + Conclusion(重申立場)，則可以成為一篇文～
先給你解一解你的題目～～
Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of a nation’s history. However, some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?
很多古舊建築都是一個國家的歷史，所以有法律保護。
但是，有些人則認為舊建築物應該被篩走，取而代之的應該是新的高樓大廈，因為人需要屋及辨公室。
那麼，保存舊建築物有多重要？歷史應該阻止新樓宇的發展嗎？
這條題目，你先定下你自己的立場，例如贊成。
之後再舉兩至三個有力論點，我給你一個作參考︰
As the old buildings are the collective memory of citizens, they will lose the connection between their neighbours or somebody that is related to these buildings.
以上再加以闡述，可加例子，如用皇后碼頭那些例子。
如果想加強說服力，可以用反證。
即從另一方拿取一個論點，之後再擊破它。
Introduction + Main body(3 - 4 paragraphs) + Conclusion(重申立場)，則可以成為一篇文～你好～～～
先給你解一解你的題目～～
Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of a nation’s history. However, some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?
很多古舊建築都是一個國家的歷史，所以有法律保護。
但是，有些人則認為舊建築物應該被篩走，取而代之的應該是新的高樓大廈，因為人需要屋及辨公室。
那麼，保存舊建築物有多重要？歷史應該阻止新樓宇的發展嗎？
這條題目，你先定下你自己的立場，例如贊成。
之後再舉兩至三個有力論點，我給你一個作參考︰
As the old buildings are the collective memory of citizens, they will lose the connection between their neighbours or somebody that is related to these buildings.
以上再加以闡述，可加例子，如用皇后碼頭那些例子。
如果想加強說服力，可以用反證。
即從另一方拿取一個論點，之後再擊破它。
Introduction + Main body(3 - 4 paragraphs) + Conclusion(重申立場)，則可以成為一篇文～
2010-12-02 7:35 am
話題不少舊樓，受法律保護，因為他們是一個國家的一部分的歷史。然而，有些人認為應該舊樓被拆掉，使新的方式，因為人們需要房子和辦公室。重要的是它如何保持老建築？如果站在歷史進步的方式？
收錄日期: 2021-04-23 22:41:46
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20101201000051KK00991