✔ 最佳答案
我係一個註冊護士, 喺香港有四年工作經驗, 有一個master in cadiology....
想問如果我想移民去澳洲, 可以點做呀?
Not enough information to decide.
You didn't tell us your age, where you are at the moment, your English Standard (IELTS result) and your Nominated skill (I know it is nurse, but what nurse, there are 11 different category of nurse, which subject to different cap quota.
To start, assume you are living in HK and does not have an australian degree, then the only Visa left for you is
visa 475 visa 175However, if you are currently in Australia and finished a 2 years course in Australia, you can apply for
visa 885 visa 487/887Then this assumption is important. Your english ability.
You can only continue with the visa application If your IELTS have 7 or above in all 4 paper.
If you do not have all 7, you cannot apply for any of those visas
Finally, the CAPS, basically, when the application of certain class or subclass reach their cap, even if you pass the point test, your application will STILL NOT go ahead. There are 3 possible cap currently;
Offshore/Onshore visa cap (Cap filled once the department received enough Offshore/onshore skill visa from EVERY Class/subclass) Class cap (Visa Application capped when the department received enough number of application from a class (for example, if there are enough 176 application, department will take no more 176 for the rest of the fiscal year) Skill cap (Visa application capped when enough number nominated the same skill in Each class or subclass. for example. If there are enough number of Register nurse (nec) nominated in 885/886/175/176, then registered nurse (Nec) skill will not be accepted anymore in ANY CLASS for the remainder of the yearSo, without knowing your skill, hard to say if they will go over cap.
我嗰邊冇親戚, 只有一個表哥係嗰邊既PR....
That does not help you in any ways.
If you want to apply for a sponsor visa, your sponse need to be a tier 1 relative (Brother/Sister, parent, uncle/aunt and niece and nephew . Cousin is a tier 2 relative, so, no help at all.
2010-07-08 14:42:12 補充：
If i understood DIAC webpage correctly, the suspension of 175,176 and 475 have been lifted on July 1, you can apply for those visa normally now if you satisified the skill
http://www.immi.gov.au/skilled/general-skilled-migration/whats-new.htm#c
2010-07-08 14:43:36 補充：
And technically you cannot apply for 119/121 visa as those visa are apply thru your employer, if you can find a job offer, they are responsibile for the 119/121 visa, you got no say in it.....
2010-07-08 14:45:27 補充：
You can always apply WHMV to AUS wether you have all 7 or not, but if you did not score all 7, ANMC will not regonise your qualification and so does the nursing board in each state, so if you do not have all 7, you can still come to Aus and work, just not as a nurse that's all
2010-07-09 20:07:15 補充：
lol Mr-know-nothing John Q is here again......
Anyway, first let me reply Washington first....
2010-07-09 20:10:15 補充：
I don't know about the other state, but as of the July 8 update on Qld Government Website update. The suspension of 176/475 visa were still at 30 June. And as ofJuly 8, no word on extended suspension on 176/475 visa
http://www.workliveplay.qld.gov.au/dsdweb/v4/apps/web/content.cfm?id=3703
2010-07-09 20:11:34 補充：
and as of July 1, the NSW government are updating the price for sponsoring a 176 Visa. this is a bit sketchy but i don't think NSW is currently suspending the 176 visa now, or they will not announce the change on July 1.
http://www.business.nsw.gov.au/migration/whatsnew.asp
2010-07-09 20:24:47 補充：
Ok, now, to anyone who don't know about John Q and his back story.
John Q is a person who said alot of thing but does not provide any reference. And when he fail to attack my answer, he resort to attack my personal history
2010-07-09 20:33:55 補充：
And he further insult himself by saying "Immigration Department Website should not be used as reference to illustrate point being make in yahoo"
And finallymake a fool of himself by not knowing what an "Assistant manager" do for a living in Mcdonald
2010-07-09 20:34:39 補充：
Dude, i said Mcdonald can sponsor people to Australia to flip burger, Assistant Manager Also flip burger, if you have that many friend as you said, please ask around.
2010-07-09 23:19:45 補充：
Lol dude, whatever you say,
A.) I never said anything about main duty or first responsibility, it's all you.
B.) well, i wonder how much it worth for hiring a $17/hr part time Aussie to do full time burger work?
2010-07-09 23:21:02 補充：
Let's do a small calculation.
$17 / hours, Full time work is 50 hour per week (well, actually 55 if you work 6 days a week, which you will in most mcdonald.) and 50 week work per year (2 weeks holiday)
2010-07-09 23:22:46 補充：
that's at least $42,500 per year, just to hire a parttime burger hand to do his job in full time rate.
How much is the average 457 visa rate before 2010 July 1? (no point telling me the rate now is 47k as when we had this agruement, the 47k rate was not in effect yet)
2010-07-09 23:25:47 補充：
according to DIAC website (well, i know, it's inaccurate, you say)
http://www.immi.gov.au/skilled/457-market-salary-rates.htm
it's 40k + change in regional australia
45k for other 457 visa in any area.
2010-07-09 23:27:32 補充：
dude, so you are wrong anyway, you can apply for a full time burger hand (the same job you said it take $17/hours to hire locally) and hire a foreigner to do it. Again, my friend got 5 457 visa for 5 of his Burger hand in his Hungary jack.
THIS IS NOT UNCOMMON
2010-07-09 23:28:17 補充：
sorry, it's mackey D's.....Just a hungary jack commercial pops up and i am thinking about it....lol
2010-07-10 10:18:47 補充：
ROFLMFAO
Dude, that's a federal guildline on Minimal hours work for Full time employment, it is used to determine the nature of "Full time employment" in term of governmental determination
2010-07-10 10:20:44 補充：
Did you know what that even mean?
It mean when you have to pay tax or claim centerlink, and you must be working or worked for AT LEAST 38 hour a week to be able to claim you are a full time employee. (Cos full and part time have different rate for tax and claims)
2010-07-10 10:21:26 補充：
DOES THAT MEAN FULL TIME EMPLOYEE IN EVERYJOB ONLY WORK 38 HOURS A WEEK?
NO
2010-07-10 10:22:46 補充：
Take Australian Post office desk clerk(or customer service officer) for an example.
A full time employee (Roster every business day) will work at least 45 hours per week.
How we know that?
2010-07-10 10:24:52 補充：
Cos post office open every monday top friday from 9am to 5pm (8 hours a day) + every satruday from 9am to 1pm(4 hours). Those office hour alone worth 44 hours. And you need to know, when everyone finish mailing their letter, the post office employee cannot go home just yet.
2010-07-10 10:26:30 補充：
Yopu need to clean up the post office, police up all the mail before the mail contractor come and then don't forget you need to sort out mail before OPENING HOURS to allow the postman to deliever your mail.
It could easily have been 50 hours work per week.
2010-07-10 10:29:59 補充：
Now take a look at how long a mcdonald work, as you obiviously have no idea how mcdonald work. Or what the people do.
Most Mcdonald open from 0530 to 2300 (Some of them are open 24 hours)
2010-07-10 10:33:11 補充：
so, the operating hours for mcdonald is about 18 hours a day, 7 days a week.
that's 126 hours a week.
Now, you are telling me if a full time employer in mcdonald work for 38 hours a day, then in 1 week, the owner need to hire 4 full time employee to man 1 (ONE) counter.
2010-07-10 10:34:48 補充：
that does not make sense......AT ALL.
in fact, mcdonald full time employment have 2 shifts. day shift and night shifts. (3 shifts if you work in 24 hours Mackers)
each shift require to work 9 hours a day. 6 days a week (Pick either weekend)
2010-07-10 10:36:15 補充：
So, it's 54 hours a week, not 38.
Dude, next time before you said i am wrong and clim somthing is right, can you read carefully what they are for first? I used to work in a mcdonald as a team leader, i think i know how to run a mcdonald.
2010-07-10 10:37:15 補充：
When the federal government guildline setting the mimimal wages is 15 AUD per hours. Does that mean every job in Australia only pay $15 an hours? Anyone pay more than $15 per hours then said to be broken the law?
2010-07-10 10:42:38 補充：
dude, use more of your brain then your hairy old behind.
I don't know how is mr henry, but you are dead wrong on the Register nurse in QLD thing, try this
http://www.workliveplay.qld.gov.au/dsdweb/v4/apps/web/content.cfm?id=13714
2010-07-10 10:45:07 補充：
I don't need to confess to you, you are giving advice base on what you think it's right, which most of them are wrong. My answer is based on the publication i can find and law in apporiate to it. And i quote where it come from. but you?
2010-07-10 10:46:22 補充：
You can badmouth me all day for all i care, but in the end, people here may have questions, but they are not stupid, will they believe someone quote all the reference or someone just come out of his mouth?
2010-07-10 10:47:42 補充：
I encourage you to keep attacking me too, cos i thought of this is a sign pof weakness. I never, ever doubt any people of their background even how redicious their answer were. Why do that if you can attack his answer? Doing those stuff mean you have already admitt that you are a failure.
2010-07-10 10:54:22 補充：
And by the way, i like the list you quoted, if you would take a moment to look at the list, you will find medical professional and doctors werealso NOT ON THE LIST.
Dude, your list is a normal list, where Nurse and doctor were listed in PRIORITY LIST (Which they need it more urgently...)
2010-07-10 10:54:44 補充：
Really laught my ass off on this one dude. Seriously.
2010-07-10 21:19:27 補充：
Dude, first of all, i think it's safe to say is, if you hire 10 people to work for a suburban post office, then those 10 person are no way working in full time. If you are smart, you should know.
2010-07-10 21:20:33 補充：
Second of all, if you still think that guild line is apply to all job so that every full time worker in Australia only work 38 hours, then all i can say is, you are dumber than i think.
From what i hear from you, you obiviously have not work full time in Australia
2010-07-10 21:22:28 補充：
Now, about the henry stuff, you and him should be together, dumb and dumber.
You and him are both a joke, i forgotabout him long time ago
That dude has not done anything, he does not even ask the Department properly. I have contacted the department 3 times after that
2010-07-10 21:23:53 補充：
EVERYTIME, the department said to apply for sponsorship for australian permenant resident, you need to reside in Australia if you are PR. If you don't know anything about it, i would suggest that you ask the department yourselve.
2010-07-10 21:25:24 補充：
What's more, i have already quote the form saying "Australian permanent resident should be regularly reside in Australia in order to apply for sponsorship" It is written in the god damn form to begin with, and he still say i am lying.
2010-07-10 21:26:03 補充：
Anyone with an eye (No need both) and a computer can find out the trurt of who's lying and who's not, the publication is for all to see, there are no denialing anything that's already written in the form.
2010-07-10 21:27:25 補充：
The reason he have act like what he act is probably the same as you, don't admitt that they are wrong, even i have show the 475 list from the Queensland Government Website already and the from for partner migration to proof that i am right.
2010-07-10 21:28:25 補充：
Both John Q and henry does not supply counter proof to proof what i said was wrong, only saying my stuff is incorrect.
Well, if you choose to believe either John Q and Henry, you should not be here asking question.
2010-07-10 21:35:20 補充：
The problem for both of them are, they speak too much, only attack people answer to allow a shift of focus on their own answer.
This is a cheap tactics as anyone could see. As this represent no quality of their answer what so ever.
2010-07-10 21:36:13 補充：
You can keep saying other people answer is wrong, but that does not mean the other answer is actually wrong. Nor does it mean your answer is correct or better.
Everybody have hands, so everybody can say the other's info is wrong.
2010-07-10 21:37:50 補充：
The only way you can actually proof the other's answer is wrong is by supporting or supply counter proof. But we ddefinitely not hearing any from John Q or Henry in this department.
They both write pages after pages of stuff saying other people's answer is incorrect
2010-07-10 21:38:58 補充：
Bu there are not any word from them saying where the stuff goes wrong or from where. or any correction info.
People with a brain will know, information is not wrong just because you said it is. Unless you are a knowledge master know it all, then that's another story
2010-07-10 21:40:13 補充：
Then comes to attack other personal history.
This is the lowest of them all. The last of the last resort to even direct attention a way from their own failure.
2010-07-11 00:05:09 補充：
Now, this is what i said what is people are going out loud and making noise. Why i hate these people? Becaues they have no substance or anything, just saying other's answer was wrong and their answer is right
2010-07-11 00:07:40 補充：
Now i can't teach you over a thousand years ignorance, but if you plan on doing this, it will be fine. Your choice, not mine
You can still proof something that does not exist, or that need not to be exist, if they say it's not gonna need anything from you to apply for a spouse visa
2010-07-11 00:09:02 補充：
Then i will just shut up.
The problem is, is it worth justified those unfound nonsensual accusation with an answer? I mean, anyone could challenge anyone in a public channel
2010-07-11 00:10:25 補充：
But not every challenge are justified for an answer. I am here to answer question, not answer what is y background. Nor would i benefit from answering question here. If you think i can help you, then i am glad. If not, then you can just not choose me for best answer. That's fine too.
2010-07-11 00:12:15 補充：
but to attack others answer just to score some points here, well, i guess people with a brain and common sense will know. Those kind of people, does not deserve an answer nor even a slight regonision.
2010-07-11 00:13:42 補充：
I welcome people challenge my answer, i never lied (Well, i did, but not in here), i never need any points. If you want to challenge my answer, i would like you to provide justifiable ground on your challenge, instead just "Becasue i think you are wrong, then you are wrong"
2010-07-11 00:15:01 補充：
Everybody know in here, how redicious John Q is by saying
"You need 10 people to run a 1 counterPost Office"
"Since the federal guildline for full time employment is 38 hours, all worker must only work 38 hours."
2010-07-11 00:16:36 補充：
or "Government webiste is unreiable for reference (But then he quote me on the Queenlands Governmental portal)"
People with an eyes, an internet connection and some common sense will know
Those things was far fetch at least, even to impossible to make sense
2010-07-11 00:18:07 補充：
Normally i would just ignore wild accusation like that as a normal person with his own sound mind will pick up who is in the wrong here, I quote all the stuff i said in my answer, if you don't believe it, then check it. No point agruing to me what the website said is not true.
2010-07-11 00:19:21 補充：
Cos i did not write them, it's their own governmental stance, written by the own people, i didn't put the content there, nor is itcoming from any dodge website.
General public with a sound mind and an eye could distingish who's lying and who's not. Not need me to say anything.
2010-07-11 00:20:27 補充：
You can all just look at what john Q wrote and you will see, most (about 85%) of his comment and answer is not referring to the question. About half of it is accusing other's work was wrong and the other was accusing other background or something.
2010-07-11 00:22:57 補充：
Finally, if 176 or 475 can both be sponsor by State government, and even if Queensland 475 was not sponsoring nurse, NSW's 475 list have nurse in it, so the asker can still apply 475 in register nurse.
2010-07-11 00:26:55 補充：
and about the form 40S, THERE ARE NO FORM 40S, you even copy the wrong information from the other question.
The form is Form 40SP and From 47SP.
2010-07-11 00:33:48 補充：
And booklet 1
The Usually Australian Resident part
Booklet 1 Page 15 line 10, under Sponsoring eligibility
http://www.immi.gov.au/allforms/booklets/1127.pdf
2010-07-11 00:34:56 補充：
If you are an Australian permanent resident or eligible New Zealand citizen, you are required to be [usually resident in Australia].
The sponsor document is in Form 40SP Page 11 Lower right hand corner
http://www.immi.gov.au/allforms/pdf/40sp.pdf
2010-07-11 00:36:13 補充：
well, in that quetion, the asker is asking for his permanent resident wife to apply for him to Australia in HK, i said she couldn't cos in booklet 1 stated. The australian permanent resident sponsor MUST BE USUALLY RESIDE in Australia.
2010-07-11 00:37:18 補充：
Now i don't know what is the English standard of John Q and Henry, but my standard told me Usually reside in Australia mean you live in OZ for the most of the time. Then if you have a full time job in Hong Kong, you are then NOT living in Australia for the most of your time
2010-07-11 00:38:46 補充：
If this is not an logical explanation, then i don't know what is.
John Q and henry want people to see what they want you to see, just to cover their incomplete answer, me, i want you to see the proof, which is logical as you are answering question. You answer is nothing without proof.
