原來英首相不是 一人 一票選出??

原來英首相不是 一人 一票選出, 而是由小圈子互選!
Prime Minister is technically a product of 1 vote 1 voice system, but instead of the vote is directly coming from voter, voter vote on their perference party and the perference party elected their prime mininster candidate.

Usual practices was the chair of the majority winner would become prime mininster, there are two exceptions

1.) In a Coalition Government, when the majority perference is allied by 2 or more party, those praty will need to reach an agreement on who is Prime Minister and who'svice.

2.) In a Hung Parliament, prime minister are usually appointed by the hung party by strucking a deal in every party involved (Such as 2010 UK election) or risk parliament to declare the vote is powerless and a subsequent Re-election

The traditional role of PM were usually,but not necessarily a MP who also have duty as one of the Minister Title (Such as Minister of Defence or Minister of Immigration) then hence the name Prime Minister (The leader of Minister) However, PM is not necessarily a MP (Member of the Parliament) is not always the case as demostrate by Australian PM John Howard, he was Prime Minister of Australia until 3 December 2007 but lost his MP seat to Maxine Mckew in 24 Nov 2007.




2010-05-15 19:12:34 補充：
Actually it's hard to say as it really depends on voter itself.

Some like specific PM but not the party that PM belong to, or some like the party that represent them, but not like the PM that party nominate, it's very hard to achieve both to satisify all voters.

2010-05-15 19:14:24 補充：
It'sabout the case of you vote 1 and get all, or you vote all to get 1.

But given the fact that law are introduced and passed by both house (Lower and Upper) and house of lord, i would say, Vote for party and nominate their leader was not a bad decision

2010-05-15 19:14:35 補充：
on the other hand, PM's just a representative of a country, does not really have any power to alter a country's politic

2010-05-15 19:19:19 補充：
I cannot answer you your second question as i did not vote this time...

But generally it's a perference system and Lib Dem thistime is partnered up with Conservative Party, maybe their policy is more attractive than the labor government

2010-05-15 19:19:43 補充：
It's hard to say cos this is voter perference...

發問者根本不懂政治，不知什麼是「內閣制」，白痴一個。

奇怪的問題，哪個國家不是小圈子選舉呢，那個地方不是小圈子選舉呢，那個立法會議員不是小圈子出來呢，那個區議員不是小圈子搞店。全世界都是一樣，一個國家一家公司，一個家庭，裡面一定有小圈子，因為人性就是這樣，為什麼呢？本身人多起來就有實力，預見事情發生就人多好做作了，就算打交都可以多點人手。
樓主是嗎？

2010-05-15 09:27:52 補充：
所以話一個人一票的虛藝無比，連一個小孩也欺騙不到，香港還要一人一票做咩呢？
比那些九流政棍呃呃騙騙20萬一個月，香港市民真係慘，普羅大眾發夢都無20萬一個月呀

　正確而言，英國首相是由大選中勝出的政黨黨魁出任。
　如今屆英國大選，在野保守黨取得較大多數國會議席，雖然保守黨要與自由民主黨結盟，組織聯合政府，惟保守黨黨魁卡梅倫，獲英女皇伊利沙伯二世授權，組織新政府；副首相則由自由民主黨黨魁克萊格擔任。
　英國的選舉制度是全國分為若干選區，每個選區選出一個下議院議員，這些下議院議員是由一人一票，單議席單票制選出。
　這種制度對傳統大政黨有優勢，對細小政黨如自由民主黨則相當不利。

Biu：
請詳細一些你對英國的General Election的'小圈子互選'一詞畧加解釋 ? 我想你不會。