China vs united states in war only conventional weapons and no nuclear who would win?

If your refering to nuclear as nuclear weapons, it would be a even war, but the chinese would be likely to come out on top, and heres why.
China has a vast population, if they where to initiate a Imediate Draft, and start to produce tanks and weapons, the United States would be over run. China has a population exceeding 1billion, and if they where to have a imediate draft, i think they could easily have around 400-500million soldiers, almost 100-200 thousand more then the entire population of the United States. (US census 2000, 300 thousand people in US.)
The only reason we wouldn't be stomped into the ground (by we i mean American's/United States) is because we hold the most technologicly advanced weapons (tanks, soldiers,bombs, aircraft... etc.) So we would be able to hold our ground for the long run. But would be eventually over whelmed.

If nuclear weapons where initiated. No doubt, the united states. We are number 2 in the world with the most nuclear weapons. (Just behind Russia). Also, since the united states is larger -i believe- they would have more land to nuke then we would.

China military is strong at defense and it's never their intention to attack anyone. It would be a case like Vietnam War that neither party won but both suffered heavy casulties.

In a land war the chinese would win for sure, they have pretty much the same sort of mentality as the Vietnamese, the Americans were killing them at a rate of 10 to 1 American and they still kept coming, and the chinese have an endless supply of cannon fodder!

Air and sea battles would surely be in the Americans favor, even better just keep sending in those drones ( do those count as conventional ?)

My answer is the same as every other one of these ridiculous and pointless X vs. Y questions:

Define win?

Exactly what constitutes victory?

One has to know that before deciding who might first achieve it. Can't know the answer without knowing the question after all.

you mean without aircraft carriers and ocean liners and planes?

No one: they wouldn't be able to fight each other

WE ARE THEE MOST COMBAT EXPERIENCED MILITARY IN THE WORLD. WE HAVE FOUGHT ALMOST EVERYBODY, AND THOSE WE HAVEN'T FOUGHT, WE HAVE CROSS TRAINED WITH. NUCLEAR, WE WOULD WIN. AIR, WE WOULD WIN. SPACE, WE WOULD WIN. AS FOR THE GROUND FIGHT, WE WOULD OPEN UP A CAN OF MOTHER ****** **** ON THEM. RESISTANCE IS FUTILE AGAINST AN ALL VOLUNTEER MILITARY.IF WE FORMED A DRAFT, WE WOULD PULL IT OFF. IT WOULD BE CALLED: OPERATION GET BEHIND THE DRAFTEES. AND AND AFTER THEY ARE DEAD, LET THE VOLUNTEERS DUKE IT OUT WITH THEIR HIGHER RANKS OF THE CHINESE ARMY. WETHER WE HAVE WON, OR LOST DUE TO DUMBASS LIBERALS RUINING THE FUN FOR US IN THE PAST, WE STILL LEARNED SOMETHING.
YOU DON'T PLAY AROUND WITH SOMEBODY THAT HAS AS MUCH EXPERIENCE AS WE DO.
IF THEY DID BEAT US, I WOULD TAKE IT AS A COMPLIMENT. REASON BEING IS THE FACT THAT WE TECHNICALLY BE THE MOST COVETED TROPHY IN THE WORLD. BUT THEY WOULDN'T. AFTER THEY ""DEFEATED OUR MILITARY, THEY WOULD HAVE TO DEAL WITH ALL OF OUR GANG BANGERS, WHO PREFER OUR GOVERNMENT TO THEIRS. IT GIVES THEM MUCH MORE LENIENCE. ONE CATCH.... YOU MUST LOOK AT WHO THE LEADERSHIP OF THIS COUNTRY IS. MY SCENARIO WOULD ONLY WORK IF THERE WAS A CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN IN POWER. UNDER CURRENT "CONDITIONS", THE GUY AT THE TOP WOULD PROBABLY TRY TO TALK HIS WAY OUT AND APOLOGIZE FOR UNNECESSARY THINGS. THAT NICE GUY ADDITUDE WONT WORK. ANYTHING TNHAT WE HAVE AT THE INFANTRY LEVEL OR ABOVE, IS TOP NOTCH. MY LONGING FOR A GOOD FAIR FIGHT WOULD ACTUALLY LIE WITH RUSSIA. THEY ARE VERY SIMILAR TO US, BUT LACKING THE EXPERIENCE. THEY CAN STILL FIGHT, THOUGH. THEY HAVE BEEN PRACTICING THIS SCENARIO FOR A LONG TIME. IF YOU BELIEVE THE COLD WAR IS OVER, YOU ARE A FOOL. THEY ARE GETTING FEEDBACK FROM OUR ENEMIES. TRUST ME. IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN ARE JUST THE SEQUELS TO THE ORIGINAL COLD WAR.