Work Kinetic Energy Theorem

2010-05-04 6:21 pm
1.)

A net force F = -2.00x i - 3.00 y j acts on a certain object with a mass m=2.00 kg while it moves from a point with coordinates (2.00, 3.00) to a point with coordinates (2.00, -1.00) along a straight line. At the first point, the speed of the object was 2.00 m/s. Using the work kinetic energy.

a.) find the speed of the object when it is at second point
b.) Find the speed of the object at the second point in this case.


This is the question, and this is the answer from my professor:

Ans:

W = Kinetic Energy(final) - Kinetic Energy(initial)

Integral( F dot product dr) = Kinetic Energy(final) - Kinetic Energy(initial)

r = 2 i + y j
dr = 0 + dy j

W = Integral ( (-2x i - 3y j) dot product ( 0x i + dy j) )
= Integral ( 0 + (-3y) dy )
= Integral from -1 to 3 ( -3y dy )

= 12 J

12 J = 1/2 (2)( vf ^2 )- 1/2 (2) (2)^2
16 J = vf ^2

vf = 4 J



My question is, how can I get the r and the dr ? And why do we need to useIntegral( F dot product dr) to find work ( is that because the force is varying? but how? )

Please explain to me. really need help

回答 (2)

2010-05-05 5:06 am
✔ 最佳答案
There is a contradiction in the question. A net force of -2xi - 3yj would cause the mass to move in both x and y directions, instead of only in the y direction as given in the question.

Nonetheless, if we only consider the motion in the y-direction, then work done W is given by,

W = integral [-3y.dy], with limit of integration from 3 to -1
hence, W = [-(3/2)y^2], with limit from 3 to -1
W = (3/2).[-1 + 9] J = 12 J

Q: how can I get the r and the dr ?
You are considering the motion in the y-direction, hence an infinitesimal displacement is represented simply by dy.

Q: why do we need to useIntegral( F dot product dr) to find work ( is that because the force is varying? but how? )
SInce dW = F.ds
so, W = integral [ F.ds]

If F is a constant force, then W = F.s
If not, you have to evaluate the integral.
2010-05-06 12:39 am


收錄日期: 2021-04-29 00:01:55
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100504000051KK00287

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份