translation(eng to chi) urgent

2010-05-01 5:39 pm
Mistakes about energy myths
Washington Post, The (DC) - Thursday, April 29, 2010
Robert Bryce's April 25 Outlook commentary, "Five myths about green energy," contained several misleading arguments.

First, the fact that it takes relatively more space to generate wind or solar energy is irrelevant. A large solar farm has exponentially less environmental impact than the same land allocated to an oil or gas refinery. One need only look at the recent oil rig explosion in the Gulf of Mexico to understand that energy produced per square meter is not a particularly useful way to compare relative "greenness."

Second, Mr. Bryce asserted that in spite of Denmark's extensive use of wind power, it has only managed to keep carbon dioxide emissions flat since 1990. In fact, Denmark Energy Agency data show that carbon dioxide emissions per capita have dropped by roughly 25 percent.

Finally, his claim that alternative energy simply exchanges dependence on one set of unsavory regimes for another mistakenly confuses production capacity for production potential. The United States has the world's second-largest reserves of rare-earth elements (after China) used in alternative energy technologies. Should China's control of production prove problematic, the United States could simply ramp up production domestically.

回答 (1)

2010-05-05 12:56 am
✔ 最佳答案
譯文如下:

關於能源神話的錯誤
華盛頓郵報於2010年4月29日刊登了羅伯特布萊斯在4月25日發表的”關於綠色能源的5個神話”的評論,刊載一些混淆視聽的議論.
首先,事實上產生風力或太陽能與需要一個較大的空間是無關的.一個大型太陽能農場比同一大型的煉油廠或天然氣提煉廠對環境的影響指數要相對減少成倍..人們只要看看最近在墨西哥灣發生的鑽油井台爆炸所產生的能源, 便會明白用其產生出來的每平方米能源來比較相對的”綠色”是不是一個特別有用的方法.
第二點,布萊斯先生說,儘管丹麥的風力發電已被廣泛使用,但它只能保持在1990年以來二氧化碳的排放量的水平.事實上,丹麥的能源機構發佈的數據表明,人均二氧化碳的排放量已經下降了大約25%.
最後,他主張替代能源依賴於一套討厭的體制的簡單交換,,再次錯誤地混淆了生產能力和生產潛力.美國是(在中國之後)世界第二大擁有利用儲藏稀土元素來代替能源生產技術的國家,如果中國在控制稀土生產上証明有問題,美國便可以簡單地在國內提高生產.


收錄日期: 2021-04-13 17:14:55
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100501000051KK00356

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份