I've just read a sentence in a prose that I found so weird, could someone help solve my doubt?
The sentence is shown below:
"He was separated from his wife, and his three teenage children LIVED with him"
My question is why 'lived' (past participle) is employed instead of 'living' (present participle), which means 'who lived with him' in the past. Doesn't 'lived' contain a passive meaning?
Or else, the sentence itself is somewhat grammatically incorrect?
Thanks in advance