Proof-reading (2 verbs in 1 sentence)?

2010-02-12 4:37 pm
I have just come across a statement that I think it is grammatically incorrect, could someone prove my view?

The sentence is here:
"Australian agricultural authorities have anncouced they are to trial a new milking system THEY BELIEVE COULD REVOLUTIONIZE life for the average dairy farmer.

What I concern is that there seemingly there are 2 verbs in one sentence "believe" and "revolutionize", am I correct? or if the sentence is in fact corrent?

Thanks
更新1:

Thanks for those who answered my question. Now I have a clearer understanding about the sentence. Could the sentence be rewrite as below: Australian agricultural authorities have anncouced (that) they are to trial a new milking system (that) THEY BELIEVE (that) COULD REVOLUTIONIZE life for the average dairy farmer Where (that)s are just omitted in the original sentence. Is my thought correct?

回答 (3)

2010-02-12 5:12 pm
✔ 最佳答案
There is nothing wrong with having more than one verb in a sentence.

The rule is that a sentence must have at least one verb.

The sentence you quote actually has many verbs:

Announced
Trial
Believe
Revolutionize

For the verb believe - "they" is the subject and the "milking system" is the object.
For the verb revolutionize - "milking system" is the subject and "life for the average farmer" is the object.
2010-02-13 12:42 am
It's correct. They are saying they believe that it could revolutionize life...
They are not saying that it will revolutionize life but that it's possible.
2010-02-13 12:42 am
First of all, change the wording...


Australian agricultural authorities have announced they are to TRY a new milking system THEY BELIEVE COULD REVOLUTIONIZE life for the average dairy farmer.

There are several verbs...have announced, try, believe, revolutionize...but the PREDICATE (main verb) is "have announced."


收錄日期: 2021-04-30 23:38:29
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100212083726AAgCJ0A

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份