SHM energy cons.

2010-02-06 8:45 pm
1998

圖片參考:http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/2861/sshot20100206123912.png










by energy conservation,


KE at eq. + PE(g) at eq = PE(e) at lowest


0.5(50)(20^2)+50(10)A=0.5(64)(A^2)

A=27.1



my solution is wrong or the experimental result does not follows the law of conservation of energy?
更新1:

sorry i forgot to name it A is amplitude

回答 (2)

2010-02-07 2:55 am
✔ 最佳答案
I suppose your A represents the distance CD in the diagram. The Law of Conservation of Energy always holds. It is your equation that is wrong. You have missed out the elastic potential energy stored in the rope at point C. Since at this point, the rope has already extended by a length equals to BC,
Hence, based on the Law of Conservation of Energy, the equation should be written as,

KE of boy at C + PE of boy at C + elastic PE of rope at C = elastis PE of rope at D

(1/2)mv^2 + mgA + (1/2)k(BC)^2 = (1/2)k(BD)^2 ------------ (1)
where m is the mass of the boy,
A = distance CD
g is the acceleration due to gravity
k is the force constant of the rope

using BD = BC + CD = BC + A
The term (1/2)k(BD)^2 on the right hand side of the equation can be written as,
(1/2)k(BD)^2 = (1/2)k(BC+ A)^2 = (k/2)[BC^2 + 2(BC)A + A^2] ------- (2)

At point C , mg = k(BC), hence BC = mg/k
thus, (2) becomes,
(1/2)k(DB)^2 = (k/2)[(mg/k)^2 + 2mgA/k + A^2]

Equation (1) then becomes,
(1/2)mv^2 + mgA + (1/2)k(mg/k)^2 = (k/2)[(mg/k)^2 + 2mgA/k + A^2]
i.e. (1/2)mv^2 + mgA + (mg)^2/2k = (mg)^2/2k + mgA + (1/2)k.A^2
finally, we have,
(1/2)mv^2 = (1/2)kA^2

Therefore, the term mgA (i.e. 50(10)A ) in your equation is redundant.

2010-02-07 1:53 am
Sorry, but what is A?


收錄日期: 2021-04-29 17:33:08
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100206000051KK00595

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份