Would Ahmadinejad still be in power in Iran, if they had the right to bear arms?
2010-02-04 5:44 pm
Would Iran be able to disregard the civil unrest in the population so easily if that population was armed? Would conflict only push Iran towards oppressive rule or would an armed population averted voting fraud in the first place?
回答 (5)
2010-02-04 5:59 pm
✔ 最佳答案
Yes, he would maintain his power and would you like to know the perfect example? We have the right to bear arms and have the most firepower amongst citizens of any nation, yet we allow crooks, swindlers, and globalists to rape our political system and economy.
2010-02-04 5:59 pm
NO,thank jimmy carter for this mess.
2010-02-04 5:53 pm
Many protesters were armed which involve some of the charges against them.
2010-02-04 5:48 pm
No. It would only have meant that the government would have had to crack down more violently and do more killing.
2010-02-04 5:52 pm
you nailed it in the second phrase of your question.
Voting fraud.
I guess we'll never know.
walk softly and carry a big stick( a gun really) might have deterred the shameful process of "cooking" the result of the election.
Voting fraud.
I guess we'll never know.
walk softly and carry a big stick( a gun really) might have deterred the shameful process of "cooking" the result of the election.
收錄日期: 2021-04-20 20:45:24
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100204094400AAxP6WU