Had been worn clothes ??

2010-01-28 7:16 pm
Marys baby was sleepinng after who had been worn clothes.
Marys baby went to sleeping after who had been worn clothes.
( Marys baby 穿完衫之後就去睡覺了. )
( 1. 可以用who嗎?, 2, 過去的被動句是否( had been worn )嗎?


好想問一樣東西
過去式past tense : wore
過去的過去past of past tense: had worn
過去完成式past perfect tense: had worn ( 是否同過去的過去是一樣 ) 如果是又怎樣分?
過去的過去+被動句: 是否 ( had been worn )嗎?
我好想問一個問題: 有沒有 ( 過去的過去的過去完成式+被動句) ( had had been worn )

回答 (4)

2010-01-28 7:52 pm
✔ 最佳答案
從來沒有「過去的過去」這個時式,更不要說「過去的過去的過去」了。

過去完成式:had worn,它的被動式就是 had been worn
2010-02-05 1:39 am
你搞錯左過去完成式同被動句,我覺得首先你要搞清楚幾時用 been 呢個字先。

唔用 been
He had worn his clothes before he went to bed.
佢著完件衫之後,就走去訓覺。

用 been
He had been wearing his clothes for 6 hours before he went to bed.
佢去訓覺之前已經著住左件衫六個鐘

被動句用 been
The clothes had been worn by him before he went to bed.
件衫已經被佢著左佢先去訓覺

用咩時式首先應該睇下你重點想講咩先,重點係「佢」、「件衫」定係「著衫」。
第一句無用 been 好簡單直接係佢著完件衫即刻就去訓。第二句我仲專登話六個鐘係因為用 had been wearing 係強調緊佢已經著住左件衫,而唔係岩岩著完件衫就即刻去訓,重點o係著衫度。第三句重點去左件衫度,記住件衫只會被個人著住,而唔會個人被件衫著住,所以一定係 The clothes had been worn 而唔會 He had been worn。

如果你只係想講佢著完件衫就即刻去訓覺可以簡單咁用第一句就得。

至於你問關於用 who o既問題,主要o既用法係愛黎形容前面講緊o既人,例如 I went out with Mary who is your schoolmate. 我同你講緊我同 Mary 出去,但係我仲想話埋畀你知其實 Mary 係你同學,所以先用 who,從頭到尾都係講緊 Mary。一句句子中間用 who o既時候個 who 字就係解釋畀人知「o個個人」o既意思。

如果用返你o既例句一定要用 who 的話就係 The baby who had worn the clothes before bed is Mary's son o個個著左衫先去訓o既 BB 就係 Mary 個仔。
2010-01-29 8:51 am
您好,我推薦您一個非常不錯的英語學習網站,里面有很多非常不錯的學習資源,您能從中得到不少幫助:



http://www.hkenglishstudy.info



祝您好運!
2010-01-28 8:05 pm
沒有「過去的過去」這時式的-唯一這點要在你的思想中除去,否則你會對其他出現的past tense樣(還有其他似past tense的字)的東西誤會了。
你見到的had been worn是「過去完成式+被動句」,不是你想的「過去的過去+被動句」。
其實亦不是「+被動句」,應該理解為要寫句描寫那發生在以前的完成的被動情況,所以個動詞便要用一個被動型過去完成式來寫。


收錄日期: 2021-04-11 01:18:54
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100128000051KK00446

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份