Should stay a bit longer ??

These are the full sentences, see?

They insisted we should stay a bit longer,"You can not leave yet. It is only eleven o clock."


They complained that they were too busy,"We have far too much work work at the moment."


2010-01-22 00:02:54 補充：
let me express in Chinese,

完整句子:
They insisted we should stay a bit longer,"You can not leave yet. It is only eleven o clock."
他們堅持我們多留一回兒, 便對我們說:「你們還不可以離開, 才十一點。」

They complained that they were too busy,"We have far too much work work at the moment."
他們太忙, 便抱怨說:「這一刻, 我們太多工作。」

understand?

I think, first of all, you have to make the right sentences to cover the given parts of the sentences logically, such as:
!. They insisted we should stay a bit longer, saying," You cannot leave yet. It is only eleven o'clock."
2. They complained that they were too busy, saying," We have too much work at the moment."
In that case, you can find the right match without fail.
有關你的最後補充：如以上述，那是不可互掉的了。如你要把以上互掉，那你是走出了習作的規限，也就超出原意了。

我認同003嘅答案

我都留意到tense的問題，不過唔計tense的不配情況，或者因為他們想你找一句從發言那方說的話(所以後句是present tense)，所以你所謂的配其實是找一句那情況應說的話只，從情節入手可以這樣看：

1前句說「他們要求我們多留一回兒」，找的句子(說話)便應該包括「不準離開」或「時間尚早等」意思。
2前句說「他們投訴說他們非常忙錄」，找的句子(說話)便應該包括「太多工作」或「沒有多餘時間」等子句。

你沒有告訴我們其他的配對是甚麼，又不知你不明白前句的理解錯在那裏。希望幫到你

Basically the tense does not match .

The lst pary is in past tense while the 2nd part is present tense.

2010-01-19 13:31:17 補充：
The lst part not pary