1. I told him that nothing was going to happen to me.
2. The car that I drove was a Ford.
3. The man who came into the room was small.
( I try explaining above sentences.)
第一句..我對他講,對於我沒有發生什麼.
第二句: 我駕車,我是 Ford. ( 我唔知解得啱唔啱, that 是否代表 car, 上面這句很怪,drove 和 was 又可以放一起? )
第三句: 小小的男人進入room. ( who 代表The man 嗎? 點解不直接寫 The man came into the room was small.
還有 I try to explaning above sentences. 還是 I try to explain above sentences. 還是上面 括號 這句才對...不會三句都不對啩??
( Three explain ?? )
2010-01-08 5:33 pm
回答 (2)
2010-01-08 7:30 pm
✔ 最佳答案
第一句是過去式：你曾對他說我無事嘅。第二句的結構是一句主句 main clause 加一句子句 subordinate clause 合成。主句是 The car was a Ford（這架車是福特）而子句是 that I drove（我駕駛的）。這句子句是用作形容詞來形容 car，所以這子句屬於 adjective clause。這子句一般都應盡量貼近它所形容的東西，否則會做成混亂。
第三句的結構與第二句一樣，主句是 The man was small 而子句是 who came into the room。假如按你所說寫作 The man came into the room was small 便變成沒有主句和子句之分，而整句有兩個動詞 (came 和 was) 是不正確的。
2010-01-08 11:57 pm
001 Good explanation.
I try to explain above sentences.
Try 是動詞，to explain是infinitive，所以explain不能用-ing。只有當前句係有to 的phrasal verb才會見到用-ing.
I "look forward to" explaining the questions to you.
I am "subject to" explaining this situation to the president.
I try to explain above sentences.
Try 是動詞，to explain是infinitive，所以explain不能用-ing。只有當前句係有to 的phrasal verb才會見到用-ing.
I "look forward to" explaining the questions to you.
I am "subject to" explaining this situation to the president.
收錄日期: 2021-04-11 01:14:41
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100108000051KK00298