Mi-28 vs AH64

2009-12-18 10:07 pm
兩架都差不多樣子
論機動性,武器火力係唔係Mi-28優良?

同埋Mi-28係唔係可以好似24咁load 12個士兵?

回答 (3)

2009-12-27 3:02 am
✔ 最佳答案

圖片參考:http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/AH-64D_Apache_Longbow.jpg/300px-AH-64D_Apache_Longbow.jpg


兩架都差不多樣子
論機動性,武器火力係唔係Mi-28優良?

MI-28 is not an upgrade version of MI-24. Instead, it is literally a MI-24 without troop transport ability. Earlier version of MI-28 uses the samesystem platform and weapon platform with MI-24, later version (The export Version) uses better system then the MI-24.

In all, MI-28 is not a lot better (Slight improvement i supposed) from MI-24, Russian military does not use MI-28 much cos MI-28 is actually an export sale item, aimed at oversea maket.

As for which is better, i will have to say, all Version of Apache (Except the Lowbow Version) is nearly as same standard as MI-28 (They were competition partner)

However, Longbow will stand outfrom all version of MI-28

同埋Mi-28係唔係可以好似24咁load 12個士兵?

No..........


2009-12-25 1:56 am
mi-28可以load 8個士兵
2009-12-20 1:41 am
我對俄製攻擊直升機冇乜研究
但我可以肯定Mi-28一定冇得同AH-64打
講火力
AH-64裝備既AGM-144地獄火又先進,實戰又證明work
加上射後不理
可以話係無敵
AH-64亦裝備一挺30mm M230機炮
裝彈量達1200發
唔駛諗AH-64既火力大到冇人有

講機動性Mi-28出名機動性強
唔駛講

仲有一點
AH-64裝備既雷達,夜間作戰儀器一定比Mi-28好

Mi-28係完完全全既AH
冇得運輸人員
參考: 自己

收錄日期: 2021-04-15 23:20:30
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091218000051KK00560

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份