煩請翻譯以下的英文

2009-12-08 1:07 pm
The first, is that whether conflict exists or not is a perception issue. Of course the perceived difference may not be real but conversely if the difference is real but not perceived there is no conflict.

回答 (2)

2009-12-09 9:32 am
✔ 最佳答案
唔知你係邊度揾呢篇文.個人認為言語是人溝通的工具,目的是使人明白.我覺得寫這篇文的人太過賣弄而令人難以明白.

我盡量去譯,請各位高人修改.


The first, is that whether conflict exists or not is a perception
issue. Of course the perceived difference may not be real but
conversely if the difference is real but not perceived there is no
conflict.
首先的是,衝突是否存在是觀點的問題. 當然觀點上的差異未必是真實,但相反地,如果差異是真實但未經了解,衝突基本上不存在.

although it can be beneficial for team building, avoidance can
simultaneously be detrimental in that conflicts are never resolved but also
because it results in and could even be said to exacerbate opposition to management and
reduces even more the likelihood of conflict resolution.
雖然它對團隊的建設有好處,但逃避會同時對未解决的衝突有害,亦因為其結果會產生或惡化跟管理層的抵觸,和減低解决衝突的機會.

If necessary, however, this approach may need to be dictated through
written policy by the library director, and if and when conflict does
occur, there need to be protocols in place that guide the resolution of
the crisis.
如有需要,這個做法可能需要圖書館館長立案去執行,又如果衝突真的發生,就需要一個已定的草案來引導如何解决困局.

2009-12-08 5:56 pm
第一,無論是不是存在利益衝突是一個認識的問題。當然,認為差別可能不是真實的,但反過來,如果不同的是實際的,但被認為是沒有衝突的。

雖然這樣做有利於團隊建設,可避免同時不利於在該衝突還沒有解決,但
因為它造成,甚至可以說是加劇反對管理和降低更是解決衝突的可能性。

如有必要,但是,這種方法可能需要通過書面決定的政策,圖書館館長,並且如果真的發生衝突時,我們需要有協議的地方,指導其解決危機。


收錄日期: 2021-04-15 23:41:14
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091208000051KK00217

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份