英文作文一問 - 幫我解一解題

2009-12-07 12:58 am
Topic:
There should not be laws to against the right to die is because it is as important as the right to life. Discuss

收到呢條問題, 係唔係只需要講安樂死? 其他野都唔洗講?

THX!
更新1:

但呢條問題唔係two-sided, 講agree 同 disagree呢2面咩?

更新2:

但我只需要寫約350字...

回答 (3)

2009-12-13 7:48 am
你只須要講你自己的意見(agree or disagree),不要用太多的引用。如果你只作350 字的話,你的章中心便須要更明確。
first paragraph:you need to write a attractive beginning and talk about your opinion (agree or disagree)directly.
second,third.....paragraphs:States your reason.(remember to use topic sentences for each paragraphs and remember to talk about ONLY ONE reason in ONE paragraph.Also, it is good to use counter arguement)
ending: use a memorable ending(DON'T USE in conclusion,all in all..........)
2009-12-07 5:27 am
這要求你為以下陳述作討論:

「尋死的權利與生存的權利是同樣重要的。」

因它要求你作討論,你需要有批評性思考。

在這裡,你先要為right to life和right to die作一個定義和給他們有關例子,再說明兩者的好處與壞處,這時,你需要一些法庭案例或法例或權威的文獻來支持你的論點,最後就是你的個人意見,即agree或disagree,為什麼會有這個結論呢?

以上是一個合邏輯的典型短文結構,法律短文也是採取這個形式的。
2009-12-07 1:18 am
對死亡的權利係不應該有法律去控制,因為死亡係一樣重要的生命權,
我諗唔係只係講安樂死, 要講人係應該對自己生命有責任, 係自己去決定生死...


收錄日期: 2021-04-19 20:48:19
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091206000051KK01132

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份