statistics

2009-11-22 8:16 pm
The smaller is the p-value, the stronger is the evidence against the null hypothesis, is it true ?? By the way, assuming a linear relationship between x and y, if the coefficient of correlation (r) equals -0.30, what is the result ?? a) there is no correlation b) the slope (b1) is negative c) variable x is larger than variable y or d) the variance of x is negative.

回答 (3)

2009-11-22 8:52 pm
✔ 最佳答案
1. You may say so, but the essence of hypothesis testing is not on absolute value of the p-value but on how stringent you have set the confidence level on accepting a Type II error. Usually the confidence level is set at p<=0.05. Once the p-value is <=0.05 after computation, you may reject the null hypothesis with 95% of confidence level that the null hypothesis is not rejected wrongly.

2. The result is simple.
(a) There is no relationship between two variables if and only if r=0
(c) There is no implication on which variable has greater value than the other from the r
(d) The (-) sign does not indicate anything about the characteristics of a particular variable. It only indicates the correlation between the two variables.
(b) This is the only true results among these 4. (-) indicates that the two variables are negatively correlated to each other.
2009-11-22 10:17 pm
And so, the smaller is the p-value, the stronger is the evidence against the null hypothesis, is it true or false ? Can I say that the statement is true ?
2009-11-22 8:55 pm
r = -0.3, it means there is some weak negative correlation between x & y. The conclusion is that the slope is negative.
If we exchange data x with data y, the correlation factor will remain the same, no relation to whether x is larger or not. Also variance must be >= 0, it is the sum of squares.


收錄日期: 2021-04-23 23:20:38
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091122000051KK00498

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份