propety由compnay轉為personal own

2009-11-09 1:25 am
請問如果
The limited company owns a property in HK funded a bank mortgage, THEN
limited company轉為sole proprietorship, 同埋個property 都轉埋personal own (continue with the bank mortgage under peronal own name)...

稅務上會有咩唔同左?
bank mortgage 會唔會有唔同 between limited company and proprietorship?
or 計算上面 會唔會唔同左??

感激回覆

回答 (2)

2009-11-09 6:30 am
✔ 最佳答案
A sole-proprietorship could not own a property as this is not a legal person. A limited company is a separate legal person from a natural person. So, a property could only be owned by a limited company or a person ( his own name ) or persons ( Joint tenants or tenants in common i.e. in equal shares )

If there is a change in ownership, there is a buying and selling of the property just like the usual one. Stamp duties and separate legal fees etc have to be paid. Moreover, the financing from a bank is quite different.

In a limited company, the bank with look for the profitability of the company and its assets backings with, sometimes, personal guarantees from the directors / shareholders before a mortgage charge on the property is being made. Profits tax is usually charged on rental income.

In a personal owned issue, the bank will look for the persoanl repayability of the person(s) and his personal assets backings. Property tax is charged on rent recieved by the owner(s).
2009-11-09 6:11 pm
由於政府對稅務取態並非以納稅人權益為主,所以好多時出現亂判及錯判嘅情況出現。如果原來物業係由公司持有,而現在轉由私人持有,其他情況不變,從正統稅務角度睇係你是否存在一個「業務」?既然私人物業同有限公司持有情況係一樣,「業務」是有限公司的延伸,以私人名義註冊獨資以期獲得稅務扣減並非天方夜譚!不過在個案中有幾個問題要解決:
1. 物業為何要從有限公司轉私人?
2. 原有公司是否祇有一個人?
3. 租客是否與原來有限公司屬於同一人?
4. 過去銀行貸款條款同現在是否一樣?
5. 過去供款由誰人支付?
僅供參考,希望幫到你!


收錄日期: 2021-04-25 20:31:45
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091108000051KK01262

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份