✔ 最佳答案
It's hard to gauge Roy Halladay's value, so if I had to make a guess, it would be in Toronto, hoping that they contend in 2010...unless there out of the playoff race before the trade deadline again. The reason that the Blue Jays would keep him is that they could have a solid rotation with Halladay, Ricky Romero, and Shaun Marcum, who's expected to return next season after Tommy John surgery. At the same time, Toronto doesn't want to have the burden of paying him $15 million next season, so he's definetly on the trade market, knowing that John Lackey is the only reliable "ace" in the market.
If Toronto indeed tried to trade him again, they would get less than stellar value, much like the Johan Santana trade to the Mets, which means contenders like the Dodgers, Cardinals, Angels, and other teams could be in play. I'm guessing that the Dodgers could be that team because they don't have to give up 5 or 6 prospects as the Blue Jays were asking before the deadline, instead only giving up 3 or 4 w/o involving Matt Kemp, Clayton Kershaw, and Chad Billingsley. The Dodgers do have enough on their payroll to take part of Halladay $15 million and a chance to resign him to an extenstion.
There a slim chance he could go to the D-Backs, mostly because of prospects. Any trade involving Halladay would have to include OF Gerardo Parra and P Jarrod Parker, not Chris Young. It's too much for the D-Backs to give up for one player, knowing that there payroll has to be lower than there opening day numbers of $73 million next season. It's also a possibility that they might let Brandon Webb go via a club option, knowing that he might not be ready to start the 2010 season, so keeping Jarrod Parker is more important than trading for Halladay in their process of rebuilding this team.