are michael jacksons kids really his?

2009-08-06 3:27 pm
Random question . . how are michael jacksons kids his? he's coloured and their biologic mother is white, so shouldn't they be halfcast? I'm confused.... it would be nice to get some answers, thanks (: x

回答 (21)

2009-08-06 3:30 pm
✔ 最佳答案
thats what i used to think.. but aparentely when he got his skin whitened that affected his genes and yeah the kids are really his and because the children's mom is white. Just because someone has mixed heritage doesn't mean that they will necessarily look "mixed". Anyone watch AMTM? Remember Jael from cycle 8? She was half black, half white. Does she look mixed to you? pic link included.
http://z.about.com/d/realitytv/1/0/-/2/1/jael.jpg
2009-08-06 3:32 pm
Uhm...question: why the heck do you care?

Yes, they are all his. It has been confirmed. Take it or leave it love it or hate it.

And being a father means a lot more than having kids that are or are not biologically yours. So just drop it.
2009-08-06 3:31 pm
Whether or not he is the biological father isn't important. He was the father of his children; he raised them and they were legally his.
2009-08-06 4:12 pm
They are his kids just not biologically at least the first two arent
Arnold Klein is the daddy, if I am wrong I am wrong, but
I have strong feeling about it, I saw a younger pic of Arnold
today and wow Prince, and Paris. I think Prince inherited
the skin problems from his father Arnold as he is a dermatologist
who had skin problems himself.

He should be able to see the kids, he saw them more than
Debbie ever did, and MJ was very close with him.

Blanket has MJ's eyes but the mother is apparently
black and he looks half white.

Arnold Kleins ex partner stated that MJ was sterile and
asked Arnold to donate sperm to his employee Debbie
and Arnold was happy with that as he wanted kids too
and he is an openly gay man and he wouldnt have kids
otherwise, MJ obviously felt ok sharing the kids with
Arnold but not Debbie she wanted the money and is
still receiving spousal support in an agreement not
to see the children. She broke that rule but is
still receiving money, after the memorial I am sure
both Debbie and Arnold saw how sad the kids were
and regretted not seeing them.

As for Omer, I think he tried to look like MJ with the
chin dimple and all, but there was one photo it looked
like MJ back in the day, so I guess we may never know
the truth but it dont matter anyway because it would
take away all that MJ did for them, but its still
important they know what there family history etc
is. I think Paris wanted a mother, she was always
making boxes of cards for employees of MJ and
you could tell she was missing having a female
parent.

Did MJ get the chin dimple from surgery ????
Did Omer have it as a child ???? I dont know ?
Their eyes are similar, I am so curious as
there are so many secrets its hard to know
who MJ really was
2009-08-06 3:48 pm
This depends what you consider as Evidence 1st they don't have his DNA but they have the DNA of his dermatologist Surrogate mother & him never had sex. This says they are not his biologically.Being the biologicall father does not make the father either.Yes he is the father they have depended on for their well being & this qualifies him as their father.There are many men that claim they have children but they are not the father.I hope I did not confuse you.There are untold thousands of children who do not know who fathered them especially in the black community.These kids grow up giving birth to other children which may actually be their siblings.Brother & sister may give birth which can cause mental illness which is rampant in the black community.RESPONSIBLE BLACK LEADERS ARE TRYING TO GET THE BLACK FATHERS TO BE REAL MEN & BE FATHERS & RAISE THEIR CHILDREN & PUT A STOP TO THIS NIGHTMARE TH ATS DESTROYING THE BLACK HOME.OOPS I'M NOT SCREAMING JUST HIT WRONG KEY.
2009-08-06 3:36 pm
Jael's mother is clearly mixed race. Michael claimed to only be a tiny bit white and so imo they are not his kids.
2009-08-06 3:36 pm
I know a couple. One of them is black, one is white. They have two kids and both are completely white with no trace of their dad's black genes at all. Does that mean they are not his? No, of course not.

And Michael brought the kids up, he gave them a home, he fed and clothed them, cared for them until the moment he died - I think it's fair to say the kids are his.

Sometimes, time and bonding really is more important than blood, and whether he is their biological father or not, it shouldn't matter - he was as much a father to them as any man could have been.
2009-08-06 3:33 pm
"Colored" do you live in the 1950's?

No, his children are not biologically his - they are not Debbie Rowe's either. They are sperm and egg donor babies implanted in Debbie.

Word is out now (the news) that they are the biological children of his dermatologist (who just fought for visitation rights) and an unknown woman. His oldest son is an adopted child that was picked up from a San Diego, California hospital - Parents unknown.


Way more information about this than I ever wanted to know..........But it's always on the news
2009-08-06 3:33 pm
halfcast? Do you mean Mixed? Parents do not have to give birth to children to be their parents. It appears that Michael would have done anything for the children and has given them everything they needed. He is their father no matter what. No one could ever love the children like he did.
2009-08-06 3:30 pm
coloured? halfcast? What century are you living in?

They were his. He's dead now. As far as biologically, I don't think they came from him, but nobody has proof yet.


收錄日期: 2021-05-01 12:40:23
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090806072719AArbySP

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份