✔ 最佳答案
Not at all. He made decisions and choices based on his personal experiences. He was a student of Wing Chun in Hong Kong, but when he came to America he realized that many of the tactics of Wing Chun didn't work for him against larger stronger opponents.
He began studying all different kinds of arts and using bits and pieces that worked well for him - Fencing and Boxing primarily, but he also has sketches of grappling and some strikes that look like Savate in the Tao of Jeet Kun Do (although he never intended to publishe those works, as they were more of a personal diary).
I don't think he made any judgements per se - he simply stated what worked for his goals and what didn't. He did feel as though a lot of the formalities were "window dressing" and not pertinent to the combat aspect of the martial arts, but I don't think he dismissed anything that he found effective. By that logic, you could say that he dismissed fencing, boxing, and other arts that he did not fully embrace. He wasn't a purist, clearly.
But if you watch his movements in movies or the few demonstrations that were filmed, you see that he uses WC type blocking and striking philosophy. Watch for the way that he keeps his hands protecting the centerline and almost always keeps his "wu sao" or protecting hand back. That's straight out of WC training! You even see him use chain punches, as well as a sort of skipping pak sao/gua choi (block/backfist) quite frequently on film.
Bottom line - he didn't lose faith in the totality of Kung Fu styles- he just felt that in its pure form it wasn't for him. Neither was fencing, boxing, savate, or karate.