我不認同富裕的兒童家裏比貧窮的兒童家裏快樂！
不可否認，富裕的兒童家裏可能要什麽就有什麽，玩具一大堆，穿的都是名牌的，吃的都是上等的好料，零用錢多，還有，日常生活都有保姆來照顧，每天飯來張口，衣來伸手。而貧窮家的小孩，可能吃不飽，穿不暖，玩具沒有很多，從小就要學會獨立，堅強。相比之下，富裕的兒童家裏可能比貧窮的兒童家裏快樂，因爲他們應有盡有，不愁吃，不愁穿，但是，我覺得那不是真正的快樂，那只是表面上，物質上的滿足。
首先，富裕家的兒童的父母可能都是從商，每天都要應酬，所以就沒有時間很好的跟子女相處，甚至忽視了子女的感受，子女就交給家裏的保姆來照顧，因此雖然跟父母住在同一屋簷下，但是見到面或聊天的機會很少，從此小孩就可能變得很孤僻，很孤獨，心裏的快樂都不能跟人分享，每天都悶悶不樂。而貧窮家的兒童，雖然生活過得不是很好，但是有父母的陪伴和照顧，一家人一起製造快樂，生病有父母無微不至地照顧，生日有父母的小禮物，節日能跟父母一起過。不管快樂的還是傷心的都能跟父母分享，無憂無慮地過得很快樂。有父母的悉心的照料才能健康的成長，才能快樂地成長！
此外，大部分富裕的人疑心都很大，擔心接近他們的人都有不良的企圖，只是喜歡他們的財務，於是真心的朋友就很少。就是因爲這樣，他們都會不讓他們的子女接近普通的小孩，擔心受騙之類的，長久之後，他們的小孩就不喜歡跟其他人接觸，不願跟他們分享東西，上學有專門的私家車接送，功課有名師的指導，所以他們的小孩都不能交到知心的朋友，每天只能跟保姆或玩具玩，跟不同年齡的保姆會有代溝，怎能玩得開心呢？每天都過著公式化的生活，枯燥的生活會令他們煩悶，試問這樣的生活他們真的快樂嗎？相反，貧窮的人不會有太多的顧慮，他們的小孩每天可以跟鄰居的小孩們一起玩耍，去公園盪秋千，踢球，分享零食，分享心事，一起上學和放學，一起做功課，每天都有不同的節目，其中充滿歡笑和快樂。心靈上的快樂才是真正的快樂！
我覺得小孩子的快樂很容易滿足，只要能跟相近年齡的人一起玩耍，有父母的無微不至地照顧，有吃有穿就可以了，心靈上能夠得到滿足，這樣他們就能無憂無慮的健康快樂的成長。大部分富裕家的小孩都只有物質上的滿足，卻得不到真正的快樂，而貧窮家的小孩可能物質不是很富有，但是他們心中富有，又有心靈上和其他方面的滿足，所以生活的很快樂！
所以，我不同意富裕家的小孩比貧窮家的小孩富裕。
中文翻譯成英文（急用，謝謝）
2009-06-20 10:20 pm
回答 (3)
2009-06-20 10:37 pm
English:
I do not agree with affluent children than poor children at home a happy home!
It is undeniable that the well-off children alone at home may have to what what a lot of toys, clothing brands are, and eat good quality are expected, more than pocket money, as well as daily life has nanny to take care of daily meals to mouth opening, clothing to hand. And child poverty at home, may be food, clothing, toys do not have much, from the Institute should be independent and strong. In contrast, the well-off than the poorest children in the family home of the child happy, because they have everything, worry about food, not worry about wear, but I think it was not real happy, it is just the surface, the material meet.
First of all, the affluent parents of children at home may have been in business, entertainment every day, so there is no time to get along well with children, and even ignored the feelings of their children, children on the family nanny to look after, so While living in with their parents under the same roof, but to see the opportunity to chat face or small, from a child may become very lonely, very lonely, could not feel happy to share every day boredom. Poor children at home, although not a very good life, but accompanied by their parents and care to create a happy family together, in every possible way to sick to take care of parents, parents of small birthday gifts, holiday could have been parents. Whether happy or sad can share with their parents, have been very happy and carefree. Have to take good care of their parents to grow up healthy, to grow up happy!
I do not agree with affluent children than poor children at home a happy home!
It is undeniable that the well-off children alone at home may have to what what a lot of toys, clothing brands are, and eat good quality are expected, more than pocket money, as well as daily life has nanny to take care of daily meals to mouth opening, clothing to hand. And child poverty at home, may be food, clothing, toys do not have much, from the Institute should be independent and strong. In contrast, the well-off than the poorest children in the family home of the child happy, because they have everything, worry about food, not worry about wear, but I think it was not real happy, it is just the surface, the material meet.
First of all, the affluent parents of children at home may have been in business, entertainment every day, so there is no time to get along well with children, and even ignored the feelings of their children, children on the family nanny to look after, so While living in with their parents under the same roof, but to see the opportunity to chat face or small, from a child may become very lonely, very lonely, could not feel happy to share every day boredom. Poor children at home, although not a very good life, but accompanied by their parents and care to create a happy family together, in every possible way to sick to take care of parents, parents of small birthday gifts, holiday could have been parents. Whether happy or sad can share with their parents, have been very happy and carefree. Have to take good care of their parents to grow up healthy, to grow up happy!
參考: google translate
2009-06-20 10:25 pm
I do not agree with affluent children than poor children at home a happy home!
It is undeniable that the well-off children alone at home may have to what what a lot of toys, clothing brands are, and eat good quality are expected, more than pocket money, as well as daily life has nanny to take care of daily meals to mouth opening, clothing to hand. And child poverty at home, may be food, clothing, toys do not have much, from the Institute should be independent and strong. In contrast, the well-off than the poorest children in the family home of the child happy, because they have everything, worry about food, not worry about wear, but I think it was not real happy, it is just the surface, the material meet.
First of all, the affluent parents of children at home may have been in business, entertainment every day, so there is no time to get along well with children, and even ignored the feelings of their children, children on the family nanny to look after, so While living in with their parents under the same roof, but to see the opportunity to chat face or small, from a child may become very lonely, very lonely, could not feel happy to share every day boredom. Poor children at home, although not a very good life, but accompanied by their parents and care to create a happy family together, in every possible way to sick to take care of parents, parents of small birthday gifts, holiday could have been parents. Whether happy or sad can share with their parents, have been very happy and carefree. Have to take good care of their parents to grow up healthy, to grow up happy!
2009-06-20 14:26:09 補充：
In addition, most wealthy people are very suspicious, worried that people close to their attempts to have non-performing, just like their financial affairs, was really very few friends.
2009-06-20 14:27:11 補充：
Is because of this, they will not let their children close to normal children, worried about being cheated like a long time, their children do not like contact with other people, do not want to share things with them,
2009-06-20 14:27:24 補充：
go to school have a special private cars transport, there are teachers homework guidance, so their children can not reach good friends, day or toys to play with the nanny, the nanny with the different age groups there will be a generation gap, how can it have fun?
2009-06-20 14:27:47 補充：
Formulistic live every day life, life would be boring to make them any more, how can this kind of life they really happy? In contrast, the poor do not have too many concerns, and their children per day with the neighbor's kids play together,
2009-06-20 14:27:57 補充：
went to a park to swing, play, share snacks, to share feelings with and from school, doing homework together, different types of programs every day, which is full of laughter and happiness.
2009-06-20 14:28:07 補充：
Spiritual happiness is the real happiness!
I think the joy of a child is easy to meet, as long as similar ages could play together,
2009-06-20 14:28:16 補充：
there are parents in every possible way to take care of, there will be food and clothing, and the soul can be satisfied, so that they can engage in healthy the growth of happiness.
2009-06-20 14:28:17 補充：
there are parents in every possible way to take care of, there will be food and clothing, and the soul can be satisfied, so that they can engage in healthy the growth of happiness.
2009-06-20 14:28:40 補充：
Most better-off children at home only to meet the material, but not real happy, and poor children at home may be the material is not very rich, but rich in their minds, and spiritual and other aspects of the meet, so life very happy!
2009-06-20 14:28:46 補充：
Therefore, I do not agree with the rich family's children's children than the poor richer.
2009-06-20 14:29:27 補充：
尾3和4多了一
It is undeniable that the well-off children alone at home may have to what what a lot of toys, clothing brands are, and eat good quality are expected, more than pocket money, as well as daily life has nanny to take care of daily meals to mouth opening, clothing to hand. And child poverty at home, may be food, clothing, toys do not have much, from the Institute should be independent and strong. In contrast, the well-off than the poorest children in the family home of the child happy, because they have everything, worry about food, not worry about wear, but I think it was not real happy, it is just the surface, the material meet.
First of all, the affluent parents of children at home may have been in business, entertainment every day, so there is no time to get along well with children, and even ignored the feelings of their children, children on the family nanny to look after, so While living in with their parents under the same roof, but to see the opportunity to chat face or small, from a child may become very lonely, very lonely, could not feel happy to share every day boredom. Poor children at home, although not a very good life, but accompanied by their parents and care to create a happy family together, in every possible way to sick to take care of parents, parents of small birthday gifts, holiday could have been parents. Whether happy or sad can share with their parents, have been very happy and carefree. Have to take good care of their parents to grow up healthy, to grow up happy!
2009-06-20 14:26:09 補充：
In addition, most wealthy people are very suspicious, worried that people close to their attempts to have non-performing, just like their financial affairs, was really very few friends.
2009-06-20 14:27:11 補充：
Is because of this, they will not let their children close to normal children, worried about being cheated like a long time, their children do not like contact with other people, do not want to share things with them,
2009-06-20 14:27:24 補充：
go to school have a special private cars transport, there are teachers homework guidance, so their children can not reach good friends, day or toys to play with the nanny, the nanny with the different age groups there will be a generation gap, how can it have fun?
2009-06-20 14:27:47 補充：
Formulistic live every day life, life would be boring to make them any more, how can this kind of life they really happy? In contrast, the poor do not have too many concerns, and their children per day with the neighbor's kids play together,
2009-06-20 14:27:57 補充：
went to a park to swing, play, share snacks, to share feelings with and from school, doing homework together, different types of programs every day, which is full of laughter and happiness.
2009-06-20 14:28:07 補充：
Spiritual happiness is the real happiness!
I think the joy of a child is easy to meet, as long as similar ages could play together,
2009-06-20 14:28:16 補充：
there are parents in every possible way to take care of, there will be food and clothing, and the soul can be satisfied, so that they can engage in healthy the growth of happiness.
2009-06-20 14:28:17 補充：
there are parents in every possible way to take care of, there will be food and clothing, and the soul can be satisfied, so that they can engage in healthy the growth of happiness.
2009-06-20 14:28:40 補充：
Most better-off children at home only to meet the material, but not real happy, and poor children at home may be the material is not very rich, but rich in their minds, and spiritual and other aspects of the meet, so life very happy!
2009-06-20 14:28:46 補充：
Therefore, I do not agree with the rich family's children's children than the poor richer.
2009-06-20 14:29:27 補充：
尾3和4多了一
2009-06-20 10:23 pm
OKaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
參考: OK
收錄日期: 2021-04-15 18:29:39
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090620000051KK00913