林燕妮的低能謬論

2009-06-19 9:56 pm
請細讀下文:

圖片參考:http://photos-d.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs104.snc1/4774_100820141582_713536582_2520227_4609500_n.jpg

看完這篇令人髮指的專欄, 你會怎樣回信?
更新1:

回石石: 10^6 有他的好處: 通常10^(3倍數) 都可以簡化符號. 想想, 如: 10^6 g = 10^3 kg = 1 ton...

更新2:

btw, 這篇文章是一星期前的. 如果有人在明報見到任何更正啟示請通知聲, 想看看她怎樣道歉 =p

回答 (6)

2009-07-03 3:02 pm
✔ 最佳答案
民建聯副主席張國鈞,在《左右紅藍綠》節目中失言,指「北極是一個人少企鵝多的地方」,結果除了引來網民恥笑外,亦衍生出不少網民惡搞作品諷刺張國鈞。詳見http://evchk.wikia.com/wiki/%E6%B0%91%E5%BB%BA%E8%81%AF%E6%88%90%E5%8A%9F%E7%88%AD%E5%8F%96%E5%8C%97%E6%A5%B5%E6%9C%89%E4%BC%81%E9%B5%9D%E4%BA%8B%E4%BB%B6。

2009-06-20 05:58:10 補充:
諸葛梓岐對巴士的偉論:「搭巴士好易翻車㗎!巴士兩層咁高,轉彎好易『嘭』一聲反轉。」,引起眾多巴士迷猛烈批評,部份會員更批評她是港女。詳見http://evchk.wikia.com/wiki/%E8%AB%B8%E8%91%9B%E6%A2%93%E5%B2%90。

2009-06-20 06:24:56 補充:
如今,林燕妮在《明報》發表低能謬論,但為甚麼直到現在網絡世界和社會還未有任何反應?

相信大家都曾經有發現謬論的經驗,但為甚麼有些會引起社會熱烈討論,有些想有人討論都冇可能?其實這和發現該謬論人士在哪個地方告知大眾有關。

2009-06-20 06:39:34 補充:
民建聯副主席張國鈞和諸葛梓岐的兩個個案都有共通點,就是有人放上Youtube、高登討論區、香港討論區等人流量極高的地方,加上有人惡搞和生產改圖,才引起社會熱烈討論。

2009-06-28 07:28:00 補充:
這題我想回答。請延長發問時間。

2009-07-03 07:02:45 補充:

圖片參考:http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment01.jpg


圖片參考:http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment02.jpg


圖片參考:http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment03.jpg


圖片參考:http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment04.jpg


圖片參考:http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment05.jpg


圖片參考:http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment06.jpg


圖片參考:http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment07.jpg


圖片參考:http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment08.jpg


圖片參考:http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment09.jpg


圖片參考:http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment10.jpg


圖片參考:http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment11.jpg


圖片參考:http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment12.jpg


圖片參考:http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment13.jpg


圖片參考:http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment14.jpg


圖片參考:http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment15.jpg


圖片參考:http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment16.jpg


圖片參考:http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment17.jpg


圖片參考:http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment18.jpg


圖片參考:http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment19.jpg


圖片參考:http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment20.jpg


這篇文章絕對不能放在《明報》,只能放在其他地方,因為恐怕會與《明報》產生立場衝突。

2009-07-04 06:05:59 補充:
最衰都係管理員,加插了新功能,但搞到一用HTML編輯工具的時候就出問題!

2009-07-04 06:13:31 補充:
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment01.jpg

http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment02.jpg

http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment03.jpg

2009-07-04 06:14:28 補充:
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment04.jpg

http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment05.jpg

http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment06.jpg

2009-07-04 06:14:51 補充:
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment07.jpg

http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment08.jpg

http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc82/doraemonpaul/yahoo_knowledge/comment/comment09.jpg
2009-06-20 6:21 pm
0.35x106 is a scientific notation
1x1010 is also a scientific notation from our common mathematical sense
I think 林燕妮 use the superscript to stand for the "no. of zero" is her whole representation, but may not be well accepted in the world.
I think no one could answer why? 1x1010 = 10,000,000,000.00
It is just a notation with some mutual consenus.

Back to the medicine example:
Please note the unit is not the same.
the statement is not:-
0.2g < 0.35x106 CFU
gram is not CFU
so we can't determine just based on the figure.


2009-06-29 09:33:55 補充:
the question has not yet closed. You could reply now, doraemonpaul.
2009-06-20 2:45 am
其實10的10次方和1後有10個0是沒分別。
但是下文的350的6次方則和35000000有天淵之別。該寫成35乘10的6次方。乘號是怎麼也不能夠抹去,這一些的基本規則在中三的課本已有教。
就當她所言屬實,一篇文章起碼要顯淺易明,怎可能放一些文字高深到不為人所知?
2009-06-19 11:45 pm
只看開頭很難理解為甚麼她說10^10不是10的10次方﹐不過看到35000000=350^6 就終於明白。我認為她應該即時看看關於數值分析的書。例如

Handbook of Applicable Mathematics. v. 3. Numerical methods

英語で学ぶ数値解析

Applied Mathematics Series Vol. 3 Numerical Methods

An introduction to numerical methods : a MATLAB approach

那個廣告也有點玄。「暫定二年」? 好似有主觀成份似的。
2009-06-19 10:34 pm
對!!
可是...沒有人會寫0.35*10^6, instead, 3.5*10^5...既然覺得人地唔明既話,
咁咪寫中國數字lor.....

10^10 = 10的10次方 = 1後10個0....

你既數學都幾好wor

2009-06-19 19:15:25 補充:
我知有佢既好處,
但係知道(I MEANT, 清楚記得)條種科學記數法既...又有幾多個人?
既然林小姐數學咁好,又清楚明白以上的道理,
咁佢又點解要用科學記數呢?

ps 我好歹都係F.2

2009-06-19 19:20:15 補充:
就算你唔識,都禁下caltor啦,
360^6 = 217678233600000 = 2.18 * 10 ^ 15 or 2 176 782 336 * 10 ^5
360 * 10 ^ 6= 360 000 000
2009-06-19 10:31 pm
10^20=>不是1後邊有20個0嗎?
350^6跟35000000似乎是2樣不同的東西吧,怎可以抹除乘號?


收錄日期: 2021-04-20 22:30:03
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090619000051KK00880

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份