被控盜竊而不認罪

個官通常會點判，會否判監，好視乎他的案情，求情及感化報告的建議。由於沒有看過被告人及証人的口供，亦不知道被告人的家庭背景，所以不能在這裡武斷或不負責任回答你會怎判。

而處理刑事既律師一般都不會平!如果你有法律問題想諮詢律師，其實你可以在這裡找到一些律師行願意為你免費提供不多於45分鐘的初步法律諮詢。
http://www.choosehklawyer.org/tc/search_fl_practice_areas.asp

在上庭前
現在要做的,就是被告人立即尋求法律意見,找私人律師,如果無錢找私人律師的話,被告人仍可去各區的民政署或立法會議員辦事處,要求安排見免費律師尋求意見.

在上庭當日
為保障被告人的權益,被告人應認真考慮上庭當日,委託私人律師代表他,為他據理力爭.如果被告人無錢找私人律師的話,他在上庭那天早上,去法庭的當值律師服務辦事處,尋求當值律師代表他,為你據理力爭。

不要等喇,被告人快去找律師吧!
希望被告人無事喇!

根據現時法律的審訊制度 , 想推翻口供必需有証據証明當初口供係被 "威迫 " 或 "利誘 "下作供 ,否則法庭只會相信差人----話係被告人自己回答口供 , 到時入罪就難免因 "無悔意 " 而判即時坐監 ,又根據現時 "判例 ", 老人家係末犯過事的話 , 又有好既求情理由 , (另需賠償事主損失) , 其實守行為或判監但緩刑係好大好大 机會既 ,,, 通常請私家律師收費各不同 , 主要係出名與否而定 ,一般認罪求情費用三至五萬會係好好既律師 ,但最好有熟人介紹就唔怕被搵笨 ,切記!!!!!切記!!!!另外 ,現時呢類案情一般係判監不超過六個月.

In this case, there are various weak point for the case:
1. Plea suggested by the police.
The legal procedure is after the police read the right to the suspect, the police starts the process to gathering information (or testimony). But not suggest you to plea. It may constitute obstruction of justice. It is the right of suspect say whatever he wants, even his own confession. But it should not be something that suggested by the police.
2. Intent
In a case like this, the Department of Justice, by the help of the police, must establish an intent that the suspect has the intention to get the property in a dishonest way. In this case, they are weak.
3. The signature.
I doubt the suspect in this case is highly educated. I don't really think that he knows what exactly has written in the testimony.
What you should do is find a lawyer or contact legal-aid. And tell them the whole situation. I think utlimately the DOJ will drop all charges in the end.

No. Theft or stealing will result imprisonment.

老人家幾歲? 那是什麼商店? 有閉路電視嗎? 可有拍下他"拿了東西後與街坊談話後忘了付款"? 有好多重要的證據都要拿到才可證明他是"無心之失"
例如街坊可以作證嗎?
如需更多, 可leave message給我

基本上初犯+認罪 都是罰款 + 付堂費..
唔會要坐監,,
可以放心