正九邊形尺規做圖

2009-04-28 7:20 am
做出許多種之圖形,但有些圖形如正七邊形、正九邊形就做不出來。有些問題看起來好像很簡單 十邊及正十七邊,但不可能造出正七邊及正九邊形。
http://www.im.ntu.edu.tw/~b94032/image/work/geom.doc
p.1的正九邊形尺規做圖有什麼問題?
不要給我一大堆理論,我讀完先問的。
更新1:

根據高x的理論 質數邊形尺規做圖要是2^2t+1 >100只有3、5、17 冇9

更新2:

高斯

更新3:

izayoi_ami 唔知就唔好嘈la 我畫個,純用圓規加直線(唔係尺)就得 如果要用有刻度的工具就唔會問la

更新4:

ckcwow 我有《典雅的幾何》手

更新5:

畫一個六角星用點1,2,3做圓心穿過六角星中六角形的兩點,

回答 (3)

2009-04-28 8:20 am
✔ 最佳答案
尺規作圖 的用的 尺和規 也是 沒有刻度
所謂"做不出來" 是指 利用 沒有刻度 的 工具去作圖...
(數學用語是 不可構造)

使用有刻度的工具 把任意的角分三等份 是極其簡單的

然而若要使用 沒刻度的工具 , 那麽連簡單的 60度也不能將之三等份
(即是說 20度角是不可構造)

正九邊形的作圖法 牽涉 把已知角 分三等份

(正九邊形 內角為 140)

如有方法 可以不使用 沒有刻度的工具構造出 正九邊形
即是說 140度 的角是 可構造的 那麽與其 互補的 40度的角也是可構造

另一方面 , 任意角可使用沒刻度的工具二等分
亦即是說 20度 是可構造
有矛盾

2009-04-28 23:20:06 補充:
問人野請你禮貎d 好wor...

btw, logically, your construction is impossible , (please find a book to read about the angle of 20 degree is not constructible)
I believe your construction use approximation rather than exact.

2009-04-28 23:20:10 補充:
If you really want to know, please list out the detail of your construction rather than just giving a complete diagram

2009-04-29 00:37:30 補充:
The next step is then, how can you draw the hexagram without measurement?
{Note: If you can do so, you can then trisect a given segment namely the side of the equilateral triangle}

2009-04-29 00:55:53 補充:
p.s.
you can construct it from a hexagon and draw equilateral triangle on each part
{those steps should be ok}
now the remaining is to verify whether you can draw,
I will give you the detail tomorrow

2009-04-29 14:31:17 補充:
In terms of construction, 3 points forms a circle, so those circles are constructible.
Finally, why do you believe the 9-gon is regular? If so, prove it.

2009-04-29 14:53:11 補充:
Indeed, none of the interior angle is 140 degree.
{This is argued as above, the impossibility of 20 degree is a result from algebra}

However, if you don't like a proof from algebra, just use simple co-geom to solve the angle or do an accurate drawing.

2009-04-29 15:11:47 補充:
If you still don't figure out what the problem is,
look at the below image file
This is an exact figure of what you said with AB=1 unit
http://i436.photobucket.com/albums/qq89/iveshoot/9-gon.jpg

2009-04-29 15:26:39 補充:
Yhe construction you mentioned is simply wrong
However, if we draw the 6 circles and choose one point from produced
a more accurate 9-gon can be constructed (the blue one)
http://i436.photobucket.com/albums/qq89/iveshoot/9-gon2.jpg
However, you can see that the length of two sides are not equal
2009-04-28 11:35 pm
或許你直接參閱《典雅的幾何》,便不會有此問題。

相信書中提出的只是一種近似的作圖法,可參考:

http://johnmayhk.wordpress.com/2008/07/31/construction-of-regular-polygons/
2009-04-28 7:37 am
「p.1的正九邊形尺規做圖有什麼問題?」是甚麼意思?
是你嘗試繪製正九邊形出現了一些小問題,導致你不成功?
還是其他?


收錄日期: 2021-04-29 18:17:45
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090427000051KK02063

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份