陳一諤就六四言論道歉 ! 請問佢點解要道歉? 道歉什麼 ?

我地普遍對六四事件有既定睇法,覺得中央鎮壓合理表達愛國民主思想嘅大學生運動.佢作為港大嘅學生會會長,佢講嘅嘢,已經唔係代表佢個人意見,係代表成個會,代表香港嘅大學生.鎮壓大學生係有片為證,遇啱六四20年,佢喺廣大嘅人面前,講到中央冇錯,有都唔係大錯,已經遺背佢地學生會嘅思想+立場,港大學生覺得佢對唔住大學生,對唔住北京死左嘅學生,所以要佢為之前喺公開場合冇人認同嘅言論道歉.簡單d嚟講,即係佢用佢嘅特權,喺1個唔啱嘅場合,講冇人啱聽嘅嘢,好似想影響人d思想,係為共產黨做洗腦,所以要佢道歉.

我認為，很多人現在討論的目的，已不再是為了搞清事實，捍衛真理，更不是為了國家繁榮，社會進步……而僅僅是一時衝動，與自己不同意見者互相打擊、報復。死抱著“面子”不放，誰反對就對誰人格攻擊。這樣做是意義不大的。

真的英雄，真的政治家，不會對個人名利斤斤計較。寧可含冤受辱，也要做對人民有利的事。他們的目的只有一個，就是做對所有人都好的事。這樣的人，道歉又如何，不道歉又如何？社會多元化就一定有矛盾有犧牲。只要清楚自己方向，不淪為“憤青”，就是值得肯定的。

知識管理員, phc6amarcoho don't seem to understand the doctrine of collective responsibility.

As a committee member (chairman actually), he expressed, in public, views that are the complete opposite to what the committe expressed.

He could have talked about those when he was not the chairman of HKU student union. What he did is, he essentially gave out the wrong impression that his views are supported by the student union or HKU. As a former so- called HKU student (well... long story), I doubt that's the view of student union and HKU.

So in speaking out his view (which is against the committee's) he has violated the doctrine of collective responsibility and should definitely apologise (strictly speaking, he should resign).

自古以來, 哪位英雄人物係唔會被人排斥? 自古英雄多災多難。
所以由此可以證明陳一諤係一位十分之有責任感, 敢於發言的真英雄!

我地普遍對六四事件有既定睇法,

覺得中央鎮壓合理表達愛國民主思想嘅大學生運動.

佢作為港大嘅學生會會長,

佢講嘅嘢,

已經唔係代表佢個人意見,

係代表成個會,

代表香港嘅大學生.

2009-04-11 12:10:05 補充：
鎮壓大學生係有片為證,

遇啱六四20年,

佢喺廣大嘅人面前,

講到中央冇錯,

有都唔係大錯,

已經遺背佢地學生會嘅思想+立場,

2009-04-11 12:11:01 補充：
港大學生覺得佢對唔住大學生,

對唔住北京死左嘅學生,

所以要佢為之前喺公開場合冇人認同嘅言論道歉.

簡單d嚟講,

即係佢用佢嘅特權,喺1個唔啱嘅場合,

講冇人啱聽嘅嘢,

好似想影響人d思想,

係為共產黨做洗腦,

所以要佢道歉.