紅磡的警員開槍案

2009-03-24 2:39 am
下午在紅磡的警員開槍案,中槍的南亞裔男子延至傍晚不治,死者身分未明,懷疑是非法入境者。

事發約於下午十二時四十分,警方接報指一名男子在紅磡常樂街近馬頭圍抽水站的山邊造成滋擾。警員到場後發現一名年約四十歲的南亞裔男子,於是上前截查,該名男子突然襲擊該名警員。

在糾纏期間,警員使用警棍及胡椒嘖霧後仍未能制服該男子,同時該男子繼續用摺櫈襲擊警員,警員最終向該男子開了兩槍,第一槍未擊中,第二槍打中該男子的耳部下方。
Did the police do it rightly?explain

回答 (3)

2009-03-24 3:15 pm
✔ 最佳答案
個人認為,警員雖有錯,但情有可源
對方只用摺櫈襲擊警員,似乎唔洗開槍
但係,一時之間要作出判斷,好難可以準確判斷

另一點係當時警員瞄準邊度黎射
如果只係制服佢,射手射腳已足夠,唔洗射頭
當然,我地無資料對此作作評價,可能警員槍法生疏姐....

事實上,警察使用武力自衛和一般人使用武力自衛受同樣法律監管
就係要係必要及合理武力
如果警員瞄準致致命部位黎射,而陪審員覺得佢使用武力自衛超出合理範圍,已可構成謀殺
2009-03-24 11:08 pm
The Police did it rightly!
The related police officer is not a short or fat guy. Even this guy cannot control the situation! Can you imagine the dead feelings that the police officer faced?
I think everyone will try his very best to defense and even use his final weapon; the gun.
If you understand the firing policy of police, you will agree that police will not use their guns easily. If the police officer can control the situation, absolutely he will not shot the "mad" man.
Bare hands can kill also if you have the Ku Fu training. To be hit by a "chair" can be fatel? Yes! Human can be killed by just one main hit on his head. So we should not blame on the police officer in this case.
2009-03-24 2:51 am
ii think 紅磡的警員 too bad because this 警員開了兩槍,第一槍未擊

收錄日期: 2021-04-19 13:46:35
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090323000051KK01283

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份