tense?

2009-03-21 3:27 pm
Is Tom here? No, he was gone before I arrived. 為什麼用 "gone" ...過去分詞和過去式一樣嗎????

回答 (2)

2009-03-21 3:59 pm
✔ 最佳答案
過去分詞是代表被的意思,但是我覺得你這一句用has gone 較為適合。He被 gone????NO!!!!!
因為你不知Tom去了哪兒,用he has gone 就可以代表這意思。(he has gone 有disappear的意思)
如果用past tense: he went to somewhere,你根本不知他是不是還在不在這屋子裏(可能他正在花園內某一角躲起來呢!),所以不太好。


2009-03-22 07:38:20 補充:
總括而言,過去分詞就像中文的被,過去式就像中文的把。相信你以前也做過一些 '被' 和 '把' 的練習。所以,過去分詞和過去式是可以互相掉換的。

He was attacked by someone:他被人襲擊,可以說:someone attacked him。

My toy car was destroy by my little brother many years ago可以說:Many years ago, my little brother destroyed my toy car:很多年前,我的玩具車被我弟弟破壞了

2009-03-22 16:31:26 補充:
past participale 也可以用來代表發生在不太久以前的事。

例如:He has just finished his homework,他剛剛完成了他的功課。

I haven't finished this thing yet,我還未做完我的功課
參考: me
2009-03-21 8:17 pm
這句的gone並非過去分詞,而是形容詞,意思是:走了,或死了(通常看前後文,就知是死了或是走了),所以你的句子用was;若用做過去分詞,你的句子就要寫成
No, he had gone before I arrived.
希望幫到你!


收錄日期: 2021-04-11 17:06:15
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090321000051KK00201

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份